YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Assessment of Stream Restoration for Reduction of Sediment in a Large Agricultural Watershed

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 007
    Author:
    Lenhart Christian F.;Smith David J.;Lewandowski Ann;Belmont Patrick;Gunderson Larry;Nieber John L.
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000908
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In many agricultural watersheds, channel erosion is a major source of sediment. In these watersheds, a comprehensive approach to reducing channel erosion can aid in the feasibility of meeting water quality goals. In the Minnesota River Basin (MRB), a large agricultural watershed, increased peak flows have contributed to greater sediment loading from within the channel. This study focuses on three components of channel restoration that are important in developing a strategic framework: sediment source reduction, working with private landowners, and the economics of restoration. A synthesis of sediment research was done to assess the sediment reduction benefit of restoration projects. While field erosion is the largest source of gross erosion, most of the sediment from fields is not delivered to the river. In the MRB, sediment from stream banks and bluffs is the dominant source, thus requiring water storage and/or stream management in order to reduce sediment load. Landowners favored edge-of-field practices that minimize the conversion of farmland and have minimal government intervention. Economic analysis of restoration showed that the most cost-effective restoration projects reduced large amounts of sediment on short stretches of lower-order streams. However ecological benefits, project sustainability, and local cultural issues suggest a role for smaller stream restoration projects. Sediment reduction estimates and assessment of ecosystem service benefits from stream restoration projects need to be further developed.
    • Download: (1.571Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Assessment of Stream Restoration for Reduction of Sediment in a Large Agricultural Watershed

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248125
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLenhart Christian F.;Smith David J.;Lewandowski Ann;Belmont Patrick;Gunderson Larry;Nieber John L.
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:35:37Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:35:37Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0000908.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248125
    description abstractIn many agricultural watersheds, channel erosion is a major source of sediment. In these watersheds, a comprehensive approach to reducing channel erosion can aid in the feasibility of meeting water quality goals. In the Minnesota River Basin (MRB), a large agricultural watershed, increased peak flows have contributed to greater sediment loading from within the channel. This study focuses on three components of channel restoration that are important in developing a strategic framework: sediment source reduction, working with private landowners, and the economics of restoration. A synthesis of sediment research was done to assess the sediment reduction benefit of restoration projects. While field erosion is the largest source of gross erosion, most of the sediment from fields is not delivered to the river. In the MRB, sediment from stream banks and bluffs is the dominant source, thus requiring water storage and/or stream management in order to reduce sediment load. Landowners favored edge-of-field practices that minimize the conversion of farmland and have minimal government intervention. Economic analysis of restoration showed that the most cost-effective restoration projects reduced large amounts of sediment on short stretches of lower-order streams. However ecological benefits, project sustainability, and local cultural issues suggest a role for smaller stream restoration projects. Sediment reduction estimates and assessment of ecosystem service benefits from stream restoration projects need to be further developed.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAssessment of Stream Restoration for Reduction of Sediment in a Large Agricultural Watershed
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000908
    page4018032
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian