YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Managing for Change: Integrating Functionality, Resiliency, and Sustainability for Stormwater Infrastructure Assessment

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;2018:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000420;3;doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000420;https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000420
    Author:
    Upadhyaya Jyoti Kumari;Biswas Nihar;Tam Edwin K. L.
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000420
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The infrastructure that serves us is aging, and yet it must remain functional to service daily needs, resilient to unforeseen events, and sustainable for future generations. This challenge emphasizes the need to accurately measure and assess the state of infrastructure to meet future demands while avoiding unwanted environmental consequences—what is truly meant by resilience or sustainability? Current assessment tools emphasize primarily the functional dimensions of environmental, social, and economic progress for infrastructure, and often as separate issues without comprehensively addressing the overall issues or changing demands. This paper presents a three-step framework focusing on the functionality-resiliency-sustainability aspects of infrastructure to assess its overall sustainability. A stormwater system in Toronto has been used to illustrate how the framework can be applied. This assessment framework is developed to integrate the three domains of functionality, resiliency, and sustainability based on three criteria: resource minimization, public health, and change management. Thirty-three indicators are identified—19 for functionality, 8 for resiliency, and 6 for sustainability—and guides have been developed for critical indicators to help decision makers step through the scoring process. A detailed multiobjective assessment is undertaken to score the overall functionality, resiliency, and sustainability of the infrastructure.
    • Download: (276.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Managing for Change: Integrating Functionality, Resiliency, and Sustainability for Stormwater Infrastructure Assessment

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4247451
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorUpadhyaya Jyoti Kumari;Biswas Nihar;Tam Edwin K. L.
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:30:28Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:30:28Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29IS.1943-555X.0000420.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4247451
    description abstractThe infrastructure that serves us is aging, and yet it must remain functional to service daily needs, resilient to unforeseen events, and sustainable for future generations. This challenge emphasizes the need to accurately measure and assess the state of infrastructure to meet future demands while avoiding unwanted environmental consequences—what is truly meant by resilience or sustainability? Current assessment tools emphasize primarily the functional dimensions of environmental, social, and economic progress for infrastructure, and often as separate issues without comprehensively addressing the overall issues or changing demands. This paper presents a three-step framework focusing on the functionality-resiliency-sustainability aspects of infrastructure to assess its overall sustainability. A stormwater system in Toronto has been used to illustrate how the framework can be applied. This assessment framework is developed to integrate the three domains of functionality, resiliency, and sustainability based on three criteria: resource minimization, public health, and change management. Thirty-three indicators are identified—19 for functionality, 8 for resiliency, and 6 for sustainability—and guides have been developed for critical indicators to help decision makers step through the scoring process. A detailed multiobjective assessment is undertaken to score the overall functionality, resiliency, and sustainability of the infrastructure.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleManaging for Change: Integrating Functionality, Resiliency, and Sustainability for Stormwater Infrastructure Assessment
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000420
    page4018007
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2018:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000420;3;doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000420;https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000420
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian