YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Decision-Making Tool for Participatory Urban Planning and Development: Residents’ Preferences of Their Built Environment

    Source: Journal of Urban Planning and Development:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Sahar S. Abdalla
    ,
    Sarah A. Elariane
    ,
    Sarah H. El Defrawi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000289
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Usually, people pursue settlements that fulfill their needs and realize their aspirations. Since the 1970s, the Egyptian government has established new urban communities to fulfill the increasing demand for housing. At the national level, the population of Egypt’s 20 new cities did not exceed 766,000 persons in 2006, or only 1.06% of Egypt’s total population. The population of these new cities reached only approximately 30% of the targeted population of 2006. On the other hand, the environmental and urban conditions in existing urban areas are deteriorating, which caused them to become expellant areas. This indicates a gap between housing supply and demand, or in other words, between what government provides and people need; in addition, there is a misallocation of resources. The present study suggests a participatory planning tool where residents elaborate on the planning/replanning process by defining their priorities. The tool, based on the analytical hierarchy process, helps professionals and decision makers to recognize the relationship between residents’ priorities and their built environment, understand residents’ mobility, evaluate existing urban settlements, and design new ones according to residents’ preferences. The paper furthermore tests the applicability of the suggested tool by selecting a middle class income sample, then defining their preferences toward their built environment to evaluate different urban areas, usually inhabited by the same socioeconomic level, using the acquired data. After testing the suggested tool and discussing its advantages and problems faced, it can be deduced that this tool not only provides an appropriate bed for evaluating the built environment based on residents’ preferences, but also facilitates the participation of residents in the urban planning process. The suggested tool could be useful for developers and decision makers while developing a new urban area or regenerating an existing one.
    • Download: (3.887Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Decision-Making Tool for Participatory Urban Planning and Development: Residents’ Preferences of Their Built Environment

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244764
    Collections
    • Journal of Urban Planning and Development

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSahar S. Abdalla
    contributor authorSarah A. Elariane
    contributor authorSarah H. El Defrawi
    date accessioned2017-12-30T13:01:56Z
    date available2017-12-30T13:01:56Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29UP.1943-5444.0000289.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244764
    description abstractUsually, people pursue settlements that fulfill their needs and realize their aspirations. Since the 1970s, the Egyptian government has established new urban communities to fulfill the increasing demand for housing. At the national level, the population of Egypt’s 20 new cities did not exceed 766,000 persons in 2006, or only 1.06% of Egypt’s total population. The population of these new cities reached only approximately 30% of the targeted population of 2006. On the other hand, the environmental and urban conditions in existing urban areas are deteriorating, which caused them to become expellant areas. This indicates a gap between housing supply and demand, or in other words, between what government provides and people need; in addition, there is a misallocation of resources. The present study suggests a participatory planning tool where residents elaborate on the planning/replanning process by defining their priorities. The tool, based on the analytical hierarchy process, helps professionals and decision makers to recognize the relationship between residents’ priorities and their built environment, understand residents’ mobility, evaluate existing urban settlements, and design new ones according to residents’ preferences. The paper furthermore tests the applicability of the suggested tool by selecting a middle class income sample, then defining their preferences toward their built environment to evaluate different urban areas, usually inhabited by the same socioeconomic level, using the acquired data. After testing the suggested tool and discussing its advantages and problems faced, it can be deduced that this tool not only provides an appropriate bed for evaluating the built environment based on residents’ preferences, but also facilitates the participation of residents in the urban planning process. The suggested tool could be useful for developers and decision makers while developing a new urban area or regenerating an existing one.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleDecision-Making Tool for Participatory Urban Planning and Development: Residents’ Preferences of Their Built Environment
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000289
    page04015011
    treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian