YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Seismic Performance Evaluation of Posttensioned Hybrid Precast Wall-Frame Buildings and Comparison with Shear Wall-Frame Buildings

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    H. A. D. Samith Buddika
    ,
    Anil C. Wijeyewickrema
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001466
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Seismic performance of posttensioned hybrid precast wall systems has been mainly studied in the past without considering the interaction of the wall system with the rest of the structure. In the present study, the multilevel seismic response of posttensioned hybrid precast wall-frame (PWF) buildings is evaluated using nonlinear response history analysis and compared with the response of shear wall-frame (SWF) buildings under unidirectional excitation. For that purpose, three-dimensional finite-element models of code-compliant 4- and 8-story PWF and SWF buildings designed with different frame shear ratios are considered. The performance of buildings is evaluated under spectrum-matched earthquake motions to represent two levels of shaking viz the design earthquake (DE) level and the risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake (MCER) level. The effect of the vertical component of earthquake motion on the peak response indicators of both types of buildings is also studied. It is determined that the seismic performance of PWF buildings is superior to SWF buildings in terms of limiting structural damage under the DE-level and the MCER-level ground motions, despite the relatively larger roof drifts observed in the PWF buildings; however, nonstructural damage caused by floor accelerations is more pronounced in the PWF buildings. In addition, it is determined that the inclusion of the vertical component of earthquake motion does not significantly affect the peak response indicators of the PWF and SWF buildings considered in this study.
    • Download: (2.730Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Seismic Performance Evaluation of Posttensioned Hybrid Precast Wall-Frame Buildings and Comparison with Shear Wall-Frame Buildings

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244499
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorH. A. D. Samith Buddika
    contributor authorAnil C. Wijeyewickrema
    date accessioned2017-12-30T13:00:48Z
    date available2017-12-30T13:00:48Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0001466.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4244499
    description abstractSeismic performance of posttensioned hybrid precast wall systems has been mainly studied in the past without considering the interaction of the wall system with the rest of the structure. In the present study, the multilevel seismic response of posttensioned hybrid precast wall-frame (PWF) buildings is evaluated using nonlinear response history analysis and compared with the response of shear wall-frame (SWF) buildings under unidirectional excitation. For that purpose, three-dimensional finite-element models of code-compliant 4- and 8-story PWF and SWF buildings designed with different frame shear ratios are considered. The performance of buildings is evaluated under spectrum-matched earthquake motions to represent two levels of shaking viz the design earthquake (DE) level and the risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake (MCER) level. The effect of the vertical component of earthquake motion on the peak response indicators of both types of buildings is also studied. It is determined that the seismic performance of PWF buildings is superior to SWF buildings in terms of limiting structural damage under the DE-level and the MCER-level ground motions, despite the relatively larger roof drifts observed in the PWF buildings; however, nonstructural damage caused by floor accelerations is more pronounced in the PWF buildings. In addition, it is determined that the inclusion of the vertical component of earthquake motion does not significantly affect the peak response indicators of the PWF and SWF buildings considered in this study.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSeismic Performance Evaluation of Posttensioned Hybrid Precast Wall-Frame Buildings and Comparison with Shear Wall-Frame Buildings
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001466
    page04016021
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian