YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Sprinkler Irrigation Pressure and Spacing Effect for Cold Protection of Strawberries

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Maria I. Zamora-Re
    ,
    Michael D. Dukes
    ,
    Craig D. Stanley
    ,
    Hubert Werner
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000928
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Irrigation for cold protection in strawberries has been used for many years to protect plants from cold damage; however, large volumes of high-quality water are needed for this purpose. Based on computer modeling for citrus, an application rate (AR) of 6.35  mm h−1 with impact sprinklers providing full coverage has been recommended and successfully used for this practice in other crops. Nevertheless, lower rates have not been field verified. Thus, the objective for this study was to assess the effect of varying irrigation system pressure and sprinkler spacing on AR and strawberry yield. The treatments evaluated consisted of grower’s practices (GROW), representing grower cold protection practices using 345-kPa irrigation pressure at 14.6-m sprinkler spacing; automated control (AC), with the same setup as GROW but testing an automated control system based on real-time dew point; low-pressure system (LOW), evaluating irrigation at 207 kPa and 14.6-m spacing; shorter spacing (SPC), assessing an irrigation system at 345 kPa and 12.2-m spacing; and nonirrigated (NI) or control. A thermostat and resistive thermodevices (RTDs) controlled irrigation for GROW, LOW, and SPC treatments in 2011–2012 and 2012–2013, respectively, whereas wireless temperature and relative humidity (RH) sensors computed dew point (DP) and activated the AC irrigation on the basis of plant specific thresholds. Significant yield differences between the irrigated treatments and NI were observed in both seasons. After a cold event, only irrigated treatments showed a comparable linear recovery of yield; however, this recovery was not found in the NI treatment. Water savings of 5% and up to 23% were achieved during the 2011–2012 and 2012–2013 seasons, respectively, using an automated irrigation system for cold protection (AC treatment). No yield differences were obtained when the irrigation system pressure was reduced from 345 to 207 kPa, but 22% water savings was achieved. Thus, a lower pressure can reduce irrigation use without affecting yield in years with mild freezes.
    • Download: (628.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Sprinkler Irrigation Pressure and Spacing Effect for Cold Protection of Strawberries

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243652
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMaria I. Zamora-Re
    contributor authorMichael D. Dukes
    contributor authorCraig D. Stanley
    contributor authorHubert Werner
    date accessioned2017-12-30T12:56:20Z
    date available2017-12-30T12:56:20Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0000928.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4243652
    description abstractIrrigation for cold protection in strawberries has been used for many years to protect plants from cold damage; however, large volumes of high-quality water are needed for this purpose. Based on computer modeling for citrus, an application rate (AR) of 6.35  mm h−1 with impact sprinklers providing full coverage has been recommended and successfully used for this practice in other crops. Nevertheless, lower rates have not been field verified. Thus, the objective for this study was to assess the effect of varying irrigation system pressure and sprinkler spacing on AR and strawberry yield. The treatments evaluated consisted of grower’s practices (GROW), representing grower cold protection practices using 345-kPa irrigation pressure at 14.6-m sprinkler spacing; automated control (AC), with the same setup as GROW but testing an automated control system based on real-time dew point; low-pressure system (LOW), evaluating irrigation at 207 kPa and 14.6-m spacing; shorter spacing (SPC), assessing an irrigation system at 345 kPa and 12.2-m spacing; and nonirrigated (NI) or control. A thermostat and resistive thermodevices (RTDs) controlled irrigation for GROW, LOW, and SPC treatments in 2011–2012 and 2012–2013, respectively, whereas wireless temperature and relative humidity (RH) sensors computed dew point (DP) and activated the AC irrigation on the basis of plant specific thresholds. Significant yield differences between the irrigated treatments and NI were observed in both seasons. After a cold event, only irrigated treatments showed a comparable linear recovery of yield; however, this recovery was not found in the NI treatment. Water savings of 5% and up to 23% were achieved during the 2011–2012 and 2012–2013 seasons, respectively, using an automated irrigation system for cold protection (AC treatment). No yield differences were obtained when the irrigation system pressure was reduced from 345 to 207 kPa, but 22% water savings was achieved. Thus, a lower pressure can reduce irrigation use without affecting yield in years with mild freezes.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSprinkler Irrigation Pressure and Spacing Effect for Cold Protection of Strawberries
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000928
    page04015034
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian