YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Effectiveness of Best Management Practices for Stormwater Treatment as a Function of Runoff Volume

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Frauke Hoss
    ,
    Jordan Fischbach
    ,
    Edmundo Molina-Perez
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000684
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Best management practices (BMPs) such as bioretentions, dry and wet ponds, porous pavement, and many other methods are widely used to reduce the runoff volume and the concentration of sediments and nutrients in the runoff. Numerical models are used to develop and assess water quality management plans that, among others, include BMPs. Those models need to take into account the BMP effectiveness to remove pollutants, being a function of the volume of daily runoff, in order to estimate their performance under a range of different climate scenarios. Circumventing the lack of monitoring data, this study used the Environmental Protection Agency’s system for urban stormwater treatment and analysis integration model (SUSTAIN) to run 22 years (1984–2005) of runoff data from the Patuxent River (Maryland) through seven types of BMPs. It was found that BMP effectiveness decreases sooner, steeper, and deeper with increasing sizes of storm events than assumed in the Chesapeake Bay Phase 5 watershed model. At a minimum, the resulting performance curves should differentiate among BMPs.
    • Download: (4.607Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Effectiveness of Best Management Practices for Stormwater Treatment as a Function of Runoff Volume

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4242234
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFrauke Hoss
    contributor authorJordan Fischbach
    contributor authorEdmundo Molina-Perez
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:23:15Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:23:15Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0000684.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4242234
    description abstractBest management practices (BMPs) such as bioretentions, dry and wet ponds, porous pavement, and many other methods are widely used to reduce the runoff volume and the concentration of sediments and nutrients in the runoff. Numerical models are used to develop and assess water quality management plans that, among others, include BMPs. Those models need to take into account the BMP effectiveness to remove pollutants, being a function of the volume of daily runoff, in order to estimate their performance under a range of different climate scenarios. Circumventing the lack of monitoring data, this study used the Environmental Protection Agency’s system for urban stormwater treatment and analysis integration model (SUSTAIN) to run 22 years (1984–2005) of runoff data from the Patuxent River (Maryland) through seven types of BMPs. It was found that BMP effectiveness decreases sooner, steeper, and deeper with increasing sizes of storm events than assumed in the Chesapeake Bay Phase 5 watershed model. At a minimum, the resulting performance curves should differentiate among BMPs.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEffectiveness of Best Management Practices for Stormwater Treatment as a Function of Runoff Volume
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000684
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian