YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Hydraulic Fracture Completion Optimization in Fayetteville Shale: Case Study

    Source: International Journal of Geomechanics:;2017:;Volume ( 017 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    John M. Lynk
    ,
    Ruthie Papandrea
    ,
    Adam Collamore
    ,
    Terry Quinn
    ,
    Eduardo Cazeneuve
    ,
    Sergio Centurion
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000713
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In November 2014, a hydraulic fracture completion optimization study was designed and executed in the Fayetteville Shale. The well with the optimized completion is the #3 well, which is an unconventional dry gas well located in Conway County, Arkansas. This well is a 13-stage horizontal well landed in Lower Fayetteville (FL2) completed with slickwater carrying 100 mesh and 30/70 proppant, using a plug-and-perf approach. The objective of the hydraulic fracture completion optimization was to minimize the differences in rock breakdown stress between clusters within each stage. The intent of minimizing the differences in stress is to ensure that each perforation cluster has an equal fracture initiation pressure, resulting in an equal fracture propagation from each cluster. Successful fracture propagation in every cluster of each stage then hopefully results in improved hydrocarbon production. The results of this hydraulic fracture completion optimization are intriguing because the optimized well, #3, is the westernmost well on a 6-well pad and had by far the highest production per foot of completed lateral, and per pound of proppant, of all wells on that pad. The production from the #3 well in the first month was approximately 56 cubic meters per day-meter (m3/d-m) [604 cubic feet per day per completed foot of lateral (cfd/ft)], compared with 45 m3/d-m (486 cfd/ft) for the adjacent well to the east, compared with approximately 27 m3/d-m (286 cfd/ft) for the easternmost four wells. Additionally, the #3 well had a substantially lower average treating pressure than the other five wells on the pad, which may suggest that more fractures were propagated in it than in the other wells. Extensive postfracture testing has not been conducted on this well pad to clarify exactly how much hydraulic fracture completion optimization contributed to the success of the #3 well. However, existing research and data can help inform theories about hydraulic fracture completion optimization. A “no impact” theory suggests that a regional geologic trend is responsible for the production uplift of the westernmost two wells. An “extreme impact” theory suggests that hydraulic fracture completion optimization is primarily responsible for the production uplift of both wells (and the wells are in hydraulic communication through their fracture stimulations).
    • Download: (3.791Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Hydraulic Fracture Completion Optimization in Fayetteville Shale: Case Study

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4240128
    Collections
    • International Journal of Geomechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJohn M. Lynk
    contributor authorRuthie Papandrea
    contributor authorAdam Collamore
    contributor authorTerry Quinn
    contributor authorEduardo Cazeneuve
    contributor authorSergio Centurion
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:13:26Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:13:26Z
    date issued2017
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GM.1943-5622.0000713.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4240128
    description abstractIn November 2014, a hydraulic fracture completion optimization study was designed and executed in the Fayetteville Shale. The well with the optimized completion is the #3 well, which is an unconventional dry gas well located in Conway County, Arkansas. This well is a 13-stage horizontal well landed in Lower Fayetteville (FL2) completed with slickwater carrying 100 mesh and 30/70 proppant, using a plug-and-perf approach. The objective of the hydraulic fracture completion optimization was to minimize the differences in rock breakdown stress between clusters within each stage. The intent of minimizing the differences in stress is to ensure that each perforation cluster has an equal fracture initiation pressure, resulting in an equal fracture propagation from each cluster. Successful fracture propagation in every cluster of each stage then hopefully results in improved hydrocarbon production. The results of this hydraulic fracture completion optimization are intriguing because the optimized well, #3, is the westernmost well on a 6-well pad and had by far the highest production per foot of completed lateral, and per pound of proppant, of all wells on that pad. The production from the #3 well in the first month was approximately 56 cubic meters per day-meter (m3/d-m) [604 cubic feet per day per completed foot of lateral (cfd/ft)], compared with 45 m3/d-m (486 cfd/ft) for the adjacent well to the east, compared with approximately 27 m3/d-m (286 cfd/ft) for the easternmost four wells. Additionally, the #3 well had a substantially lower average treating pressure than the other five wells on the pad, which may suggest that more fractures were propagated in it than in the other wells. Extensive postfracture testing has not been conducted on this well pad to clarify exactly how much hydraulic fracture completion optimization contributed to the success of the #3 well. However, existing research and data can help inform theories about hydraulic fracture completion optimization. A “no impact” theory suggests that a regional geologic trend is responsible for the production uplift of the westernmost two wells. An “extreme impact” theory suggests that hydraulic fracture completion optimization is primarily responsible for the production uplift of both wells (and the wells are in hydraulic communication through their fracture stimulations).
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleHydraulic Fracture Completion Optimization in Fayetteville Shale: Case Study
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume17
    journal issue2
    journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000713
    treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2017:;Volume ( 017 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian