YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Benchmarking System for Evaluating Management Practices in the Construction Industry

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Ricardo R. Ramı´rez
    ,
    Luis Fernando C. Alarcón
    ,
    Peter Knights
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:3(110)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper presents the results obtained for the initial application of a management evaluation system whose objective is to provide a continuous improvement tool for construction companies through benchmarking management practices. The outlined system seeks to support a benchmarking system that has been recently established in the Chilean construction industry by incorporating qualitative management aspects in addition to performance indicators. Different analyses were made to determine trends in the sector and to establish correlations between qualitative aspects coming from surveys and quantitative aspects coming from performance indicators. Thirteen construction companies participated in the initial application of the benchmarking system. A correlation analysis found that safety performance was strongly related to companies having superior planning and control, quality management, cost control, and subcontractor management policies. A factor analysis found that central office priorities focus on strategic management policies having longer-term competitive impact, while site management emphasizes tactical management dimensions having short-term impact. There is scope to elevate the profile of continuous improvement initiatives to strategic significance at the central office level.
    • Download: (136.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Benchmarking System for Evaluating Management Practices in the Construction Industry

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/42401
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRicardo R. Ramı´rez
    contributor authorLuis Fernando C. Alarcón
    contributor authorPeter Knights
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:11:51Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:11:51Z
    date copyrightJuly 2004
    date issued2004
    identifier other%28asce%290742-597x%282004%2920%3A3%28110%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42401
    description abstractThis paper presents the results obtained for the initial application of a management evaluation system whose objective is to provide a continuous improvement tool for construction companies through benchmarking management practices. The outlined system seeks to support a benchmarking system that has been recently established in the Chilean construction industry by incorporating qualitative management aspects in addition to performance indicators. Different analyses were made to determine trends in the sector and to establish correlations between qualitative aspects coming from surveys and quantitative aspects coming from performance indicators. Thirteen construction companies participated in the initial application of the benchmarking system. A correlation analysis found that safety performance was strongly related to companies having superior planning and control, quality management, cost control, and subcontractor management policies. A factor analysis found that central office priorities focus on strategic management policies having longer-term competitive impact, while site management emphasizes tactical management dimensions having short-term impact. There is scope to elevate the profile of continuous improvement initiatives to strategic significance at the central office level.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleBenchmarking System for Evaluating Management Practices in the Construction Industry
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume20
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:3(110)
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian