YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Shuffled Frog-Leaping Algorithm for Optimal Design of Open Channels

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 010
    Author:
    H. Orouji
    ,
    N. Mahmoudi
    ,
    E. Fallah-Mehdipour
    ,
    M. Pazoki
    ,
    A. Biswas
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001059
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Open channels are important water structures for irrigation, water supply, power generation, and drainage. The primary concern of designing a channel is to determine optimum dimensions while minimizing construction costs. In this paper, a memetic metaheuristic algorithms called “shuffled frog-leaping algorithm” (SFLA) is used to optimize sampling design variables of composite open channels. The results of optimization using SFLA and a generic language for interactive general optimization (LINGO) software are compared with other metaheuristic algorithms, such as genetic algorithm (GA), simulated annealing (SA), Lagrange multiplier method (LMM), ant colony optimization (ACO), improved ant colony optimization (IACO), and particle swarm optimization (PSO). Four common nonlinear models in open-channel designing are considered in this study: (1) model I (M1), which applies an equivalent roughness coefficient without any sectional division following the Manning equation; (2) model II (M2), which considers a variation of horizontal velocity over the cross section; (3) model III (M3), which determines minimum construction costs that is constrained on maximum permissible velocities corresponding to different lining materials of the composite channel cross section; and (4) model IV (M4), which imposes additional side-slope constraints over model II. Optimization results using SFLA and LINGO clearly show improvements in objective function in all the studied models. SFLA and LINGO show 14.93 and 12.64% improvement, respectively, in M1 compared to the LMM, GA, ACO, and IACO; 23.43 and 19.03% in M2 compared to GA, ACO, and IACO; 1.34 and 0.63% in M3 compared to GA and ACO; and 26.14 and 21.88% in M4 compared to GA and PSO. An improvement in the objective function is also obtained in SFLA over LINGO by 2.28, 4.40, 0.71, and 4.26%, respectively, in models M1 through M4. This result evidently demonstrates the efficiency of SFLA in optimizing composite open-channel design for increasing economic benefit.
    • Download: (359.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Shuffled Frog-Leaping Algorithm for Optimal Design of Open Channels

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4238736
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorH. Orouji
    contributor authorN. Mahmoudi
    contributor authorE. Fallah-Mehdipour
    contributor authorM. Pazoki
    contributor authorA. Biswas
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:06:51Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:06:51Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001059.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4238736
    description abstractOpen channels are important water structures for irrigation, water supply, power generation, and drainage. The primary concern of designing a channel is to determine optimum dimensions while minimizing construction costs. In this paper, a memetic metaheuristic algorithms called “shuffled frog-leaping algorithm” (SFLA) is used to optimize sampling design variables of composite open channels. The results of optimization using SFLA and a generic language for interactive general optimization (LINGO) software are compared with other metaheuristic algorithms, such as genetic algorithm (GA), simulated annealing (SA), Lagrange multiplier method (LMM), ant colony optimization (ACO), improved ant colony optimization (IACO), and particle swarm optimization (PSO). Four common nonlinear models in open-channel designing are considered in this study: (1) model I (M1), which applies an equivalent roughness coefficient without any sectional division following the Manning equation; (2) model II (M2), which considers a variation of horizontal velocity over the cross section; (3) model III (M3), which determines minimum construction costs that is constrained on maximum permissible velocities corresponding to different lining materials of the composite channel cross section; and (4) model IV (M4), which imposes additional side-slope constraints over model II. Optimization results using SFLA and LINGO clearly show improvements in objective function in all the studied models. SFLA and LINGO show 14.93 and 12.64% improvement, respectively, in M1 compared to the LMM, GA, ACO, and IACO; 23.43 and 19.03% in M2 compared to GA, ACO, and IACO; 1.34 and 0.63% in M3 compared to GA and ACO; and 26.14 and 21.88% in M4 compared to GA and PSO. An improvement in the objective function is also obtained in SFLA over LINGO by 2.28, 4.40, 0.71, and 4.26%, respectively, in models M1 through M4. This result evidently demonstrates the efficiency of SFLA in optimizing composite open-channel design for increasing economic benefit.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleShuffled Frog-Leaping Algorithm for Optimal Design of Open Channels
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001059
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian