YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Application of FIDIC Contracts under the Egyptian Civil Code

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2016:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Noha Shafik
    ,
    Sahar Qodsi
    ,
    Engy Serag
    ,
    Moustafa Helmi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000193
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This research discusses the application of Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils (FIDIC) contracts (87 and 99) when governed by Law No. 131 of 1948 promulgating the Egyptian Civil Code (ECC). Whereas several construction contracts in Egypt face conflicts arising from the application of FIDIC under the Egyptian Law, this research addresses some of the important issues, such as the force majeure, termination, interest charges, and subcontracting to manifest the similarities and differences between the FIDIC clauses and the ECC articles and explain how a contract in such conditions would be administered. This research also addresses the notice provision time bar subject, which has always been considered to be a debatable subject and has usually been an essential issue in lots of claims and disputes. The writers conclude that among these five important issues, the subcontracting is the only issue that does not impose any contradiction between FIDIC and ECC, whereas the termination issue entails some of the events that would highlight some contradictions. As for the other three issues, force majeure, interest charges and notice provision, contradictions and consequently possible disputes were present. Because of the nature of this research, the authors follow the desktop analysis approach, which would enable readers to understand the conflicted clauses/articles of the aforementioned issues. Recommendations are put forward in this research for the conflicted clauses.
    • Download: (111.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Application of FIDIC Contracts under the Egyptian Civil Code

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4238407
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNoha Shafik
    contributor authorSahar Qodsi
    contributor authorEngy Serag
    contributor authorMoustafa Helmi
    date accessioned2017-12-16T09:05:32Z
    date available2017-12-16T09:05:32Z
    date issued2016
    identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000193.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4238407
    description abstractThis research discusses the application of Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils (FIDIC) contracts (87 and 99) when governed by Law No. 131 of 1948 promulgating the Egyptian Civil Code (ECC). Whereas several construction contracts in Egypt face conflicts arising from the application of FIDIC under the Egyptian Law, this research addresses some of the important issues, such as the force majeure, termination, interest charges, and subcontracting to manifest the similarities and differences between the FIDIC clauses and the ECC articles and explain how a contract in such conditions would be administered. This research also addresses the notice provision time bar subject, which has always been considered to be a debatable subject and has usually been an essential issue in lots of claims and disputes. The writers conclude that among these five important issues, the subcontracting is the only issue that does not impose any contradiction between FIDIC and ECC, whereas the termination issue entails some of the events that would highlight some contradictions. As for the other three issues, force majeure, interest charges and notice provision, contradictions and consequently possible disputes were present. Because of the nature of this research, the authors follow the desktop analysis approach, which would enable readers to understand the conflicted clauses/articles of the aforementioned issues. Recommendations are put forward in this research for the conflicted clauses.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleApplication of FIDIC Contracts under the Egyptian Civil Code
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume8
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000193
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2016:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian