Show simple item record

contributor authorCiavarella, M.
date accessioned2017-11-25T07:19:36Z
date available2017-11-25T07:19:36Z
date copyright2016/30/11
date issued2017
identifier issn0742-4787
identifier othertrib_139_03_031404.pdf
identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235895
description abstractPastewka and Robbins (2014, “Contact Between Rough Surfaces and a Criterion for Macroscopic Adhesion,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111(9), pp. 3298–3303) recently have proposed a criterion to distinguish when two surfaces will stick together or not and suggested that it shows quantitative and qualitative large conflicts with asperity theories. However, a comparison with asperity theories is not really attempted, except in pull-off data which show finite pull-off values in cases where both their own criterion and an asperity based one seem to suggest nonstickiness, and the results are in these respects inconclusive. Here, we find that their criterion corresponds very closely to an asperity model one (provided we use their very simplified form of the Derjaguin–Muller–Toporov (DMT) adhesion regime which introduces a dependence on the range of attractive forces) when bandwidth α is small, but otherwise involves a root-mean-square (RMS) amplitude of roughness reduced by a factor α. Therefore, it implies that the stickiness of any rough surface is the same as that of the surface where practically all the wavelength components of roughness are removed except the very fine ones.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleOn Pastewka and Robbins' Criterion for Macroscopic Adhesion of Rough Surfaces
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Tribology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4034530
journal fristpage31404
journal lastpage031404-5
treeJournal of Tribology:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record