Is Architectural Pedagogy Prepared for Buildings of the Future?Source: Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 001::page 11003Author:Hemsath, Timothy L.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4034981Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Assuming that buildings in our near future can achieve carbon neutrality, what next? More importantly, what is necessary in the short term to transform the way we design and think about buildings to achieve carbon neutrality and beyond? Can architectural pedagogy deal with how buildings integrate with the larger community and ecosystem around them, how buildings are constructed and/or manufactured to optimize resource use, and how they adapt to changes and are repurposed to meet future needs? Pedagogy for this future is about instilling a way of thinking about environmental design that is both conscious of and active in energy and carbon emissions, but also the health, wellbeing, and productivity of building occupants. Expounding on these questions, this paper will analyze current architectural curriculum and recent student design competitions against the U.S. Department of Energy’s Future of Buildings initiative. The discussion of the gap analysis results shows a deficiency about thinking about architectural design for the future. The paper will highlight where our design education succeeds and falls short toward preparing students. Additionally, thinking about this future context will highlight beneficial and detrimental aspects of the current pedagogical landscape to further whole-building design concepts to achieve a carbon neutral future for the built environment.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Hemsath, Timothy L. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-11-25T07:19:15Z | |
| date available | 2017-11-25T07:19:15Z | |
| date copyright | 2016/10/11 | |
| date issued | 2017 | |
| identifier issn | 0199-6231 | |
| identifier other | sol_139_01_011003.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235687 | |
| description abstract | Assuming that buildings in our near future can achieve carbon neutrality, what next? More importantly, what is necessary in the short term to transform the way we design and think about buildings to achieve carbon neutrality and beyond? Can architectural pedagogy deal with how buildings integrate with the larger community and ecosystem around them, how buildings are constructed and/or manufactured to optimize resource use, and how they adapt to changes and are repurposed to meet future needs? Pedagogy for this future is about instilling a way of thinking about environmental design that is both conscious of and active in energy and carbon emissions, but also the health, wellbeing, and productivity of building occupants. Expounding on these questions, this paper will analyze current architectural curriculum and recent student design competitions against the U.S. Department of Energy’s Future of Buildings initiative. The discussion of the gap analysis results shows a deficiency about thinking about architectural design for the future. The paper will highlight where our design education succeeds and falls short toward preparing students. Additionally, thinking about this future context will highlight beneficial and detrimental aspects of the current pedagogical landscape to further whole-building design concepts to achieve a carbon neutral future for the built environment. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Is Architectural Pedagogy Prepared for Buildings of the Future? | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 139 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Solar Energy Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4034981 | |
| journal fristpage | 11003 | |
| journal lastpage | 011003-9 | |
| tree | Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |