YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Local Hydrostatic Pressure Test for Cylindrical Vessels

    Source: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 001::page 11601
    Author:
    Al-Gahtani, H.
    ,
    Khathlan, A.
    ,
    Sunar, M.
    ,
    Naffa'a, M.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4033533
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The juncture of a small cylindrical nozzle to a large cylindrical vessel is very common in the pressure vessel industry. Upon fabrication, it is required that the whole structure is subjected to pressure testing. The test can be expensive as it necessitates pressurizing the whole structure typically having a large volume. Hence, it is proposed to make a “local test,” which is considerably simpler as it involves capping the small nozzle and testing only a relatively small portion of the structure. This paper investigates the accuracy and reliability of such an alternative test, using the finite-element method. Two different finite-element types are used in the study, specifically a shell-based element and a solid-based element. The verification of the finite-element results for two different cases shows that the models used in the study are valid. It also proves that the two element types yield very similar stress results. In addition, the study includes a numerical investigation of more than 40 different nozzle-to-vessel junctures with a wide range of parameters for the nozzle and vessel. The results indicate that the use of cylindrical caps that are slightly larger than the nozzle is not recommended as it produces stresses that are significantly different from those for the original required pressure test. As such, the study provides an estimate of the smallest size of the cap that may be used in the local test to generate stresses that agree with the full test. For most practical geometries, it is shown that the size of the cap needs to be at least 2–30 times larger than that of the nozzle, depending on the geometrical parameters of the juncture.
    • Download: (1.364Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Local Hydrostatic Pressure Test for Cylindrical Vessels

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235533
    Collections
    • Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAl-Gahtani, H.
    contributor authorKhathlan, A.
    contributor authorSunar, M.
    contributor authorNaffa'a, M.
    date accessioned2017-11-25T07:19:02Z
    date available2017-11-25T07:19:02Z
    date copyright2016/5/8
    date issued2017
    identifier issn0094-9930
    identifier otherpvt_139_01_011601.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235533
    description abstractThe juncture of a small cylindrical nozzle to a large cylindrical vessel is very common in the pressure vessel industry. Upon fabrication, it is required that the whole structure is subjected to pressure testing. The test can be expensive as it necessitates pressurizing the whole structure typically having a large volume. Hence, it is proposed to make a “local test,” which is considerably simpler as it involves capping the small nozzle and testing only a relatively small portion of the structure. This paper investigates the accuracy and reliability of such an alternative test, using the finite-element method. Two different finite-element types are used in the study, specifically a shell-based element and a solid-based element. The verification of the finite-element results for two different cases shows that the models used in the study are valid. It also proves that the two element types yield very similar stress results. In addition, the study includes a numerical investigation of more than 40 different nozzle-to-vessel junctures with a wide range of parameters for the nozzle and vessel. The results indicate that the use of cylindrical caps that are slightly larger than the nozzle is not recommended as it produces stresses that are significantly different from those for the original required pressure test. As such, the study provides an estimate of the smallest size of the cap that may be used in the local test to generate stresses that agree with the full test. For most practical geometries, it is shown that the size of the cap needs to be at least 2–30 times larger than that of the nozzle, depending on the geometrical parameters of the juncture.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleLocal Hydrostatic Pressure Test for Cylindrical Vessels
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4033533
    journal fristpage11601
    journal lastpage011601-6
    treeJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian