YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Regulatory Framework for the Decommissioning of Indonesian Nuclear Facilities

    Source: Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2017:;volume( 003 ):;issue: 004::page 44501
    Author:
    Utami, Sri Budi
    ,
    Putero, Susetyo Hario
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4037078
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Indonesia are mainly based on Nuclear Energy Act of 1997 on, Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency (BAPETEN) Chairman Regulation (BCR) No. 4 of 2009, and Government Regulation (GR) No. 2 of 2014 that cover general provisions and licensing requirements of decommissioning and the detailed requirements and guidelines for preparing the decommissioning plan and licensee applications. BCR No. 4 of 2009 was developed based on the adoption and adaption from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety Guide, WS-G-2.1. Currently, one of three research reactors, Training Research Isotopes General Atomics (TRIGA) research reactor 2 MW (the oldest which went critical at 250 kW in 1964, and was operated at maximum in 1971, and was upgraded to 2 MW in 2000), has operated for 45 y, but there is no decision for decommissioning this reactor yet. Indonesia has experience in decommissioning of the phosphoric acid purification facility of the Gresik petrochemical plant. Some aspects of decommissioning, which have been successfully addressed to date, are: regulation, communication, and decommissioning team. Development of human resources, technological capability, and information flow from more advanced countries are an important factor for the future of the nuclear facility decommissioning plan in Indonesia. Some regulations have still not anticipated all the regulatory challenges that might be encountered in the near future. More regulations and guidance are needed to be established by BAPETEN in order to complete the current regulations so that problems can all be anticipated.
    • Download: (49.17Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Regulatory Framework for the Decommissioning of Indonesian Nuclear Facilities

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235369
    Collections
    • Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science

    Show full item record

    contributor authorUtami, Sri Budi
    contributor authorPutero, Susetyo Hario
    date accessioned2017-11-25T07:18:44Z
    date available2017-11-25T07:18:44Z
    date copyright2017/31/7
    date issued2017
    identifier issn2332-8983
    identifier otherners_003_04_044501.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235369
    description abstractThe decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Indonesia are mainly based on Nuclear Energy Act of 1997 on, Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency (BAPETEN) Chairman Regulation (BCR) No. 4 of 2009, and Government Regulation (GR) No. 2 of 2014 that cover general provisions and licensing requirements of decommissioning and the detailed requirements and guidelines for preparing the decommissioning plan and licensee applications. BCR No. 4 of 2009 was developed based on the adoption and adaption from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Safety Guide, WS-G-2.1. Currently, one of three research reactors, Training Research Isotopes General Atomics (TRIGA) research reactor 2 MW (the oldest which went critical at 250 kW in 1964, and was operated at maximum in 1971, and was upgraded to 2 MW in 2000), has operated for 45 y, but there is no decision for decommissioning this reactor yet. Indonesia has experience in decommissioning of the phosphoric acid purification facility of the Gresik petrochemical plant. Some aspects of decommissioning, which have been successfully addressed to date, are: regulation, communication, and decommissioning team. Development of human resources, technological capability, and information flow from more advanced countries are an important factor for the future of the nuclear facility decommissioning plan in Indonesia. Some regulations have still not anticipated all the regulatory challenges that might be encountered in the near future. More regulations and guidance are needed to be established by BAPETEN in order to complete the current regulations so that problems can all be anticipated.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleRegulatory Framework for the Decommissioning of Indonesian Nuclear Facilities
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume3
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4037078
    journal fristpage44501
    journal lastpage044501-3
    treeJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science:;2017:;volume( 003 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian