Hemodynamic Profile of Two Aortic Endografts Accounting for Their Postimplantation Position

Abstract

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a clinically effective technique for treating anatomically eligible abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), involving the deployment of an endograft (EG) that is designed to prevent blood leakage in the aneurysmal sac. While most EGs have equivalent operating principles, the hemodynamic environment established by different EGs is not necessarily the same. So, to unveil the post-EVAR hemodynamic properties, we need an EG-specific computational approach that currently lacks from the literature. Endurant and Excluder are two EGs with similar pre-installation designs. We assumed that the flow conditions in the particular EGs do not vary significantly. The hypothesis was tested combining image reconstructions, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and statistics, taking into account the postimplantation position of the EGs. Ten patients with Endurant EGs and ten patients with Excluder EGs were included in this study. The two groups were matched with respect to the preoperative morphological characteristics of the AAAs. The EG models are derived from image reconstructions of postoperative computed tomography scans. Wall shear stress (WSS), displacement force, velocity, and helicity were calculated in regions of interest within the EG structures, i.e., the main body, the upper and lower part of the limbs. Excluder generated higher WSS compared to Endurant, especially on the lower part of the limbs (p = 0.001). Spatial fluctuations of WSS were observed on the upper part of the Excluder limbs. Higher blood velocity was induced by Excluder in all the regions of interest (p = 0.04, p = 0.01, and p = 0.004). Focal points of secondary flow were detected in the main body of Endurant and the limbs of Excluder. The displacement force acting on the lower part of the Excluder limbs was stronger compared to the Endurant one (p = 0.03). The results showed that two similar EGs implanted in similar AAAs can induce significantly different flow properties. The delineation of the hemodynamic features associated with the various commercially available EGs could further promote the personalization of treatment offered to aneurysmal patients and inspire ideas for the improvement of EG designs in the future.