YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Steinkamp's Toy Can Hop 100 Times But Can't Stand Up

    Source: Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics:;2017:;volume( 009 ):;issue: 001::page 11017
    Author:
    Stiesberg, Gregg
    ,
    van Oijen, Tim
    ,
    Ruina, Andy
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4035337
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: We have experimented with and simulated Steinkamp's passive-dynamic hopper. This hopper cannot stand up (it is statically unstable), yet it can hop the length of a 5 m 0.079 rad sloped ramp, with n≈100 hops. Because, for an unstable periodic motion, a perturbation Δx0 grows exponentially with the number of steps (Δxn≈Δx0×λn), where λ is the system eigenvalue with largest magnitude, one expects that if λ>1 that the amplification after 100 steps, λ100, would be large enough to cause robot failure. So, the experiments seem to indicate that the largest eigenvalue magnitude of the linearized return map is less than one, and the hopper is dynamically stable. However, two independent simulations show more subtlety. Both simulations correctly predict the period of the basic motion, the kinematic details, and the existence of the experimentally observed period ∼11 solutions. However, both simulations also predict that the hopper is slightly unstable (|λ|max>1). This theoretically predicted instability superficially contradicts the experimental observation of 100 hops. Nor do the simulations suggest a stable attractor near the periodic motion. Instead, the conflict between the linearized stability analysis and the experiments seems to be resolved by the details of the launch: a simulation of the hand-holding during launch suggests that experienced launchers use the stability of the loosely held hopper to find a motion that is almost on the barely unstable limit cycle of the free device.
    • Download: (5.008Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Steinkamp's Toy Can Hop 100 Times But Can't Stand Up

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235061
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorStiesberg, Gregg
    contributor authorvan Oijen, Tim
    contributor authorRuina, Andy
    date accessioned2017-11-25T07:18:14Z
    date available2017-11-25T07:18:14Z
    date copyright2017/13/1
    date issued2017
    identifier issn1942-4302
    identifier otherjmr_009_01_011017.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4235061
    description abstractWe have experimented with and simulated Steinkamp's passive-dynamic hopper. This hopper cannot stand up (it is statically unstable), yet it can hop the length of a 5 m 0.079 rad sloped ramp, with n≈100 hops. Because, for an unstable periodic motion, a perturbation Δx0 grows exponentially with the number of steps (Δxn≈Δx0×λn), where λ is the system eigenvalue with largest magnitude, one expects that if λ>1 that the amplification after 100 steps, λ100, would be large enough to cause robot failure. So, the experiments seem to indicate that the largest eigenvalue magnitude of the linearized return map is less than one, and the hopper is dynamically stable. However, two independent simulations show more subtlety. Both simulations correctly predict the period of the basic motion, the kinematic details, and the existence of the experimentally observed period ∼11 solutions. However, both simulations also predict that the hopper is slightly unstable (|λ|max>1). This theoretically predicted instability superficially contradicts the experimental observation of 100 hops. Nor do the simulations suggest a stable attractor near the periodic motion. Instead, the conflict between the linearized stability analysis and the experiments seems to be resolved by the details of the launch: a simulation of the hand-holding during launch suggests that experienced launchers use the stability of the loosely held hopper to find a motion that is almost on the barely unstable limit cycle of the free device.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleSteinkamp's Toy Can Hop 100 Times But Can't Stand Up
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume9
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Mechanisms and Robotics
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4035337
    journal fristpage11017
    journal lastpage011017-13
    treeJournal of Mechanisms and Robotics:;2017:;volume( 009 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian