YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Impacts of Discretization Error, Flow Modeling Error, and Measurement Noise on Inverse Transport-Diffusion-Reaction in a T-Junction

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005::page 51402
    Author:
    Waeytens, Julien
    ,
    Chatellier, Patrice
    ,
    Bourquin, Frédéric
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4035806
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: By combining a physical model and sensor outputs in an inverse transport-diffusion-reaction strategy, an accurate concentration cartography may be obtained. The paper addresses the influence of discretization errors, flow uncertainties, and measurement noise on the concentration field reconstruction process. We consider a key element of a drinking water network, i.e., a pipe junction, where Reynolds and Peclet numbers are approximately 2000 and 1000, respectively. We show that a 10% error between the reference concentration field and the reconstructed concentration field may be obtained using a coarse discretization. Nevertheless, to keep the error below 10%, a fine concentration discretization is required. We also detail the influence of the flow approximation on the concentration reconstruction process. The flow modeling error obtained when the exact Navier–Stokes flow is approximated by a Stokes flow may lead to a 40% error in the reconstructed concentration. However, if the flow field is obtained from the full set of Navier–Stokes equations, we show that the error may be less than 5%. Then, we observe that the quality of the reconstructed concentration field obtained with the proposed inverse technique is not deteriorated when sensor outputs have a normal distribution noise variance of few percents. Finally, a good engineering practice would be to stop the reconstruction process according to an extended discrepancy principle including modeling and measurement errors. As shown in the paper, the quality of the reconstructed field declines after reaching the threshold of the modeling error.
    • Download: (2.320Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Impacts of Discretization Error, Flow Modeling Error, and Measurement Noise on Inverse Transport-Diffusion-Reaction in a T-Junction

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4234011
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWaeytens, Julien
    contributor authorChatellier, Patrice
    contributor authorBourquin, Frédéric
    date accessioned2017-11-25T07:16:26Z
    date available2017-11-25T07:16:26Z
    date copyright2017/21/3
    date issued2017
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_139_05_051402.pdf
    identifier urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4234011
    description abstractBy combining a physical model and sensor outputs in an inverse transport-diffusion-reaction strategy, an accurate concentration cartography may be obtained. The paper addresses the influence of discretization errors, flow uncertainties, and measurement noise on the concentration field reconstruction process. We consider a key element of a drinking water network, i.e., a pipe junction, where Reynolds and Peclet numbers are approximately 2000 and 1000, respectively. We show that a 10% error between the reference concentration field and the reconstructed concentration field may be obtained using a coarse discretization. Nevertheless, to keep the error below 10%, a fine concentration discretization is required. We also detail the influence of the flow approximation on the concentration reconstruction process. The flow modeling error obtained when the exact Navier–Stokes flow is approximated by a Stokes flow may lead to a 40% error in the reconstructed concentration. However, if the flow field is obtained from the full set of Navier–Stokes equations, we show that the error may be less than 5%. Then, we observe that the quality of the reconstructed concentration field obtained with the proposed inverse technique is not deteriorated when sensor outputs have a normal distribution noise variance of few percents. Finally, a good engineering practice would be to stop the reconstruction process according to an extended discrepancy principle including modeling and measurement errors. As shown in the paper, the quality of the reconstructed field declines after reaching the threshold of the modeling error.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleImpacts of Discretization Error, Flow Modeling Error, and Measurement Noise on Inverse Transport-Diffusion-Reaction in a T-Junction
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4035806
    journal fristpage51402
    journal lastpage051402-10
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2017:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian