H. L. Wagner's Unbiased Hit Rate and the Assessment of Categorical Forecasting Accuracy

Abstract

he paper briefly reviews measures that have been proposed since the 1880s to assess accuracy and skill in categorical weather forecasting. The majority of the measures consist of a single expression, for example, a proportion, the difference between two proportions, a ratio, or a coefficient. Two exemplar single-expression measures for 2 ? 2 categorical arrays that chronologically bracket the 130-yr history of this effort?Doolittle's inference ratio i and Stephenson's odds ratio skill score (ORSS)?are reviewed in detail. Doolittle's i is appropriately calculated using conditional probabilities, and the ORSS is a valid measure of association, but both measures are limited in ways that variously mirror all single-expression measures for categorical forecasting. The limitations that variously affect such measures include their inability to assess the separate accuracy rates of different forecast?event categories in a matrix, their sensitivity to the interdependence of forecasts in a 2 ? 2 matrix, and the inapplicability of many of them to the general k ? k (k ≥ 2) problem. The paper demonstrates that Wagner's unbiased hit rate, developed for use in categorical judgment studies with any k ? k (k ≥ 2) array, avoids these limitations while extending the dual-measure Bayesian approach proposed by Murphy and Winkler in 1987.