YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Raindrop Size Distribution Measurements by Collocated Disdrometers

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2013:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 008::page 1672
    Author:
    Tokay, Ali
    ,
    Petersen, Walter A.
    ,
    Gatlin, Patrick
    ,
    Wingo, Matthew
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00163.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: n impact-type Joss?Waldvogel disdrometer (JWD), a two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD), and a laser optical OTT Particle Size and Velocity (PARSIVEL) disdrometer (PD) were used to measure the raindrop size distribution (DSD) over a 6-month period in Huntsville, Alabama. Comparisons indicate event rain totals for all three disdrometers that were in reasonable agreement with a reference rain gauge. In a relative sense, hourly composite DSDs revealed that the JWD was more sensitive to small drops (<1 mm), while the PD appeared to severely underestimate small drops less than 0.76 mm in diameter. The JWD and 2DVD measured comparable number concentrations of midsize drops (1?3 mm) and large drops (3?5 mm), while the PD tended to measure relatively higher drop concentrations at sizes larger than 2.44 mm in diameter. This concentration disparity tended to occur when hourly rain rates and drop counts exceeded 2.5 mm h?1 and 400 min?1, respectively. Based on interactions with the PD manufacturer, the partially inhomogeneous laser beam is considered the cause of the PD drop count overestimation. PD drop fall speeds followed the expected terminal fall speed relationship quite well, while the 2DVD occasionally measured slower drops for diameters larger than 2.4 mm, coinciding with events where wind speeds were greater than 4 m s?1. The underestimation of small drops by the PD had a pronounced effect on the intercept and shape of parameters of gamma-fitted DSDs, while the overestimation of midsize and larger drops resulted in higher mean values for PD integral rain parameters.
    • Download: (2.921Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Raindrop Size Distribution Measurements by Collocated Disdrometers

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4228161
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorTokay, Ali
    contributor authorPetersen, Walter A.
    contributor authorGatlin, Patrick
    contributor authorWingo, Matthew
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:24:52Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:24:52Z
    date copyright2013/08/01
    date issued2013
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-84787.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4228161
    description abstractn impact-type Joss?Waldvogel disdrometer (JWD), a two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD), and a laser optical OTT Particle Size and Velocity (PARSIVEL) disdrometer (PD) were used to measure the raindrop size distribution (DSD) over a 6-month period in Huntsville, Alabama. Comparisons indicate event rain totals for all three disdrometers that were in reasonable agreement with a reference rain gauge. In a relative sense, hourly composite DSDs revealed that the JWD was more sensitive to small drops (<1 mm), while the PD appeared to severely underestimate small drops less than 0.76 mm in diameter. The JWD and 2DVD measured comparable number concentrations of midsize drops (1?3 mm) and large drops (3?5 mm), while the PD tended to measure relatively higher drop concentrations at sizes larger than 2.44 mm in diameter. This concentration disparity tended to occur when hourly rain rates and drop counts exceeded 2.5 mm h?1 and 400 min?1, respectively. Based on interactions with the PD manufacturer, the partially inhomogeneous laser beam is considered the cause of the PD drop count overestimation. PD drop fall speeds followed the expected terminal fall speed relationship quite well, while the 2DVD occasionally measured slower drops for diameters larger than 2.4 mm, coinciding with events where wind speeds were greater than 4 m s?1. The underestimation of small drops by the PD had a pronounced effect on the intercept and shape of parameters of gamma-fitted DSDs, while the overestimation of midsize and larger drops resulted in higher mean values for PD integral rain parameters.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparison of Raindrop Size Distribution Measurements by Collocated Disdrometers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume30
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00163.1
    journal fristpage1672
    journal lastpage1690
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2013:;volume( 030 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian