YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Different Techniques for the Measurement of Precipitation in Tropical Montane Rain Forest Regions

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2007:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 002::page 156
    Author:
    Rollenbeck, R.
    ,
    Bendix, J.
    ,
    Fabian, P.
    ,
    Boy, J.
    ,
    Wilcke, W.
    ,
    Dalitz, H.
    ,
    Oesker, M.
    ,
    Emck, P.
    DOI: 10.1175/JTECH1970.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Characteristics of different precipitation measurements in a tropical mountain valley in southern Ecuador are compared in this study to determine potential errors. The instruments are used for different ecological purposes like erosion studies, through fall measurements, investigation of atmospheric chemistry, and modeling of area rainfall distribution. Five recording devices (two precipitation radars, an electro-optical present weather sensor, and two tipping buckets) and three totaling gauges were operated in parallel at a designated site. Data were taken between 1998 and 2003 with different temporal resolution and different operational periods. The general agreement between the instruments is rather good; deviations are in the expected range of 10%?20% of the annual total of about 2200 mm. The remote sensing devices are superior in registering the frequent occurrence of light rain but are not capable of detecting the full range of rain intensities observed. The tipping buckets and the totaling gauges are reliable instruments, but a certain fraction of light drizzle and wind-driven rain is not detected. The present weather sensor has the widest range of sensitivity and supplies additional information on drop spectra. All datasets are affected by operational problems (interruptions, synchronization errors); hence, the redundancy given here seems reasonable for an ecosystem study.
    • Download: (1.184Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Different Techniques for the Measurement of Precipitation in Tropical Montane Rain Forest Regions

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4227681
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRollenbeck, R.
    contributor authorBendix, J.
    contributor authorFabian, P.
    contributor authorBoy, J.
    contributor authorWilcke, W.
    contributor authorDalitz, H.
    contributor authorOesker, M.
    contributor authorEmck, P.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:23:25Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:23:25Z
    date copyright2007/02/01
    date issued2007
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-84354.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4227681
    description abstractCharacteristics of different precipitation measurements in a tropical mountain valley in southern Ecuador are compared in this study to determine potential errors. The instruments are used for different ecological purposes like erosion studies, through fall measurements, investigation of atmospheric chemistry, and modeling of area rainfall distribution. Five recording devices (two precipitation radars, an electro-optical present weather sensor, and two tipping buckets) and three totaling gauges were operated in parallel at a designated site. Data were taken between 1998 and 2003 with different temporal resolution and different operational periods. The general agreement between the instruments is rather good; deviations are in the expected range of 10%?20% of the annual total of about 2200 mm. The remote sensing devices are superior in registering the frequent occurrence of light rain but are not capable of detecting the full range of rain intensities observed. The tipping buckets and the totaling gauges are reliable instruments, but a certain fraction of light drizzle and wind-driven rain is not detected. The present weather sensor has the widest range of sensitivity and supplies additional information on drop spectra. All datasets are affected by operational problems (interruptions, synchronization errors); hence, the redundancy given here seems reasonable for an ecosystem study.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparison of Different Techniques for the Measurement of Precipitation in Tropical Montane Rain Forest Regions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/JTECH1970.1
    journal fristpage156
    journal lastpage168
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2007:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian