YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Are Rogue Waves Really Unexpected?

    Source: Journal of Physical Oceanography:;2016:;Volume( 046 ):;issue: 005::page 1495
    Author:
    Fedele, Francesco
    DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-15-0137.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: n unexpected wave is defined by Gemmrich and Garrett as a wave that is much taller than a set of neighboring waves. Their definition of ?unexpected? refers to a wave that is not anticipated by a casual observer. Clearly, unexpected waves defined in this way are predictable in a statistical sense. They can occur relatively often with a small or moderate crest height, but large unexpected waves that are rogue are rare. Here, this concept is elaborated and statistically described based on a third-order nonlinear model. In particular, the conditional return period of an unexpected wave whose crest exceeds a given threshold is developed. This definition leads to greater return periods or on average less frequent occurrences of unexpected waves than those implied by the conventional return periods not conditioned on a reference threshold. Ultimately, it appears that a rogue wave that is also unexpected would have a lower occurrence frequency than that of a usual rogue wave. As specific applications, the Andrea and Wave Crest Sensor Intercomparison Study (WACSIS) rogue wave events are examined in detail. Both waves appeared without warning and their crests were nearly 2 times larger than the surrounding O(10) wave crests and thus unexpected. The two crest heights are nearly the same as the threshold ~ 1.6Hs exceeded on average once every 0.3 ? 106 waves, where Hs is the significant wave height. In contrast, the Andrea and WACSIS events, as both rogue and unexpected, would occur slightly less often and on average once every 3 ? 106 and 0.6 ? 106 waves, respectively.
    • Download: (1.275Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Are Rogue Waves Really Unexpected?

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4227072
    Collections
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFedele, Francesco
    date accessioned2017-06-09T17:21:42Z
    date available2017-06-09T17:21:42Z
    date copyright2016/05/01
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0022-3670
    identifier otherams-83806.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4227072
    description abstractn unexpected wave is defined by Gemmrich and Garrett as a wave that is much taller than a set of neighboring waves. Their definition of ?unexpected? refers to a wave that is not anticipated by a casual observer. Clearly, unexpected waves defined in this way are predictable in a statistical sense. They can occur relatively often with a small or moderate crest height, but large unexpected waves that are rogue are rare. Here, this concept is elaborated and statistically described based on a third-order nonlinear model. In particular, the conditional return period of an unexpected wave whose crest exceeds a given threshold is developed. This definition leads to greater return periods or on average less frequent occurrences of unexpected waves than those implied by the conventional return periods not conditioned on a reference threshold. Ultimately, it appears that a rogue wave that is also unexpected would have a lower occurrence frequency than that of a usual rogue wave. As specific applications, the Andrea and Wave Crest Sensor Intercomparison Study (WACSIS) rogue wave events are examined in detail. Both waves appeared without warning and their crests were nearly 2 times larger than the surrounding O(10) wave crests and thus unexpected. The two crest heights are nearly the same as the threshold ~ 1.6Hs exceeded on average once every 0.3 ? 106 waves, where Hs is the significant wave height. In contrast, the Andrea and WACSIS events, as both rogue and unexpected, would occur slightly less often and on average once every 3 ? 106 and 0.6 ? 106 waves, respectively.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAre Rogue Waves Really Unexpected?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume46
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
    identifier doi10.1175/JPO-D-15-0137.1
    journal fristpage1495
    journal lastpage1508
    treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;2016:;Volume( 046 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian