YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Few GIS Clarifications on Tornado Density Mapping

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2015:;volume( 055 ):;issue: 002::page 283
    Author:
    Deng, Yongxin
    ,
    Wallace, Brendan
    ,
    Maassen, Derek
    ,
    Werner, Johnathan
    DOI: 10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0141.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: geographical information system (GIS) perspective is taken to examine conceptual and methodological complications present in tornado density and probability mapping. Tornado density is defined as the inverse-distance-weighted count of tornado touchdown points or tornado-affected cells within a neighborhood area. The paper first adds a few geographic elements into the tornado definition and then characterizes tornado density as a density field in GIS that depends on predefined, modifiable areas to exist. Tornado density is therefore conceptually distinguished from both individual tornadoes and tornado probability. Three factors are identified to be vital in tornado density mapping: the neighborhood size, the distance decay function, and the choice of tornado properties. Correspondingly, 12 neighborhood sizes ranging from 20 to 360 km are tested, four distance decay functions are compared, and two tornado properties?tornado touchdown locations and pathlengths?are separately incorporated in mapping. GIS interpretations, clarifications, and demonstrations are provided for these factors to reach a thorough understanding of how the factors function and affect the resultant tornado density maps. Historical tornado data of the eastern half of the United States from 1973 to 2013 are used in these demonstrations. Uncertainty and propagation analyses are recommended for future tornado density and probability mapping, and a Monte Carlo simulation using tornado pathlength data is conducted as an example of uncertainty modeling. In all, tornado density mapping is diagnosed as a largely subjective activity, and the mapper needs to make multiple choices according to the mapping purpose, scale, and the involved tornado record data.
    • Download: (1.884Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      A Few GIS Clarifications on Tornado Density Mapping

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4217550
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDeng, Yongxin
    contributor authorWallace, Brendan
    contributor authorMaassen, Derek
    contributor authorWerner, Johnathan
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:50:57Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:50:57Z
    date copyright2016/02/01
    date issued2015
    identifier issn1558-8424
    identifier otherams-75236.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4217550
    description abstractgeographical information system (GIS) perspective is taken to examine conceptual and methodological complications present in tornado density and probability mapping. Tornado density is defined as the inverse-distance-weighted count of tornado touchdown points or tornado-affected cells within a neighborhood area. The paper first adds a few geographic elements into the tornado definition and then characterizes tornado density as a density field in GIS that depends on predefined, modifiable areas to exist. Tornado density is therefore conceptually distinguished from both individual tornadoes and tornado probability. Three factors are identified to be vital in tornado density mapping: the neighborhood size, the distance decay function, and the choice of tornado properties. Correspondingly, 12 neighborhood sizes ranging from 20 to 360 km are tested, four distance decay functions are compared, and two tornado properties?tornado touchdown locations and pathlengths?are separately incorporated in mapping. GIS interpretations, clarifications, and demonstrations are provided for these factors to reach a thorough understanding of how the factors function and affect the resultant tornado density maps. Historical tornado data of the eastern half of the United States from 1973 to 2013 are used in these demonstrations. Uncertainty and propagation analyses are recommended for future tornado density and probability mapping, and a Monte Carlo simulation using tornado pathlength data is conducted as an example of uncertainty modeling. In all, tornado density mapping is diagnosed as a largely subjective activity, and the mapper needs to make multiple choices according to the mapping purpose, scale, and the involved tornado record data.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Few GIS Clarifications on Tornado Density Mapping
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume55
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
    identifier doi10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0141.1
    journal fristpage283
    journal lastpage296
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology:;2015:;volume( 055 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian