YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparing NWS PoP Forecasts to Third-Party Providers

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2011:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 010::page 3304
    Author:
    Bickel, J. Eric
    ,
    Floehr, Eric
    ,
    Kim, Seong Dae
    DOI: 10.1175/2011MWR3525.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: n this paper, the authors verify probability of precipitation (PoP) forecasts provided by the National Weather Service (NWS), The Weather Channel (TWC), and CustomWeather (CW). The n-day-ahead forecasts, where n ranges from 1 to 3 for the NWS, from 1 to 9 for TWC, and from 1 to 14 for CW, are analyzed. The dataset includes almost 13 million PoP forecasts, or about 500 000 PoPs per provider per day of lead time. Data were collected over a 2-yr period (1 November 2008?31 October 2010) at 734 observation stations across the contiguous United States. In addition to verifying these PoP forecasts in an absolute sense, relative comparisons are made between the providers. It is found that, in most cases, TWC does not add skill to NWS forecasts. Perhaps most interestingly, it is also found that CW does have the ability to forecast PoPs at a resolution of 0.01.
    • Download: (2.303Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparing NWS PoP Forecasts to Third-Party Providers

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4214126
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBickel, J. Eric
    contributor authorFloehr, Eric
    contributor authorKim, Seong Dae
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:41:00Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:41:00Z
    date copyright2011/10/01
    date issued2011
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-72154.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4214126
    description abstractn this paper, the authors verify probability of precipitation (PoP) forecasts provided by the National Weather Service (NWS), The Weather Channel (TWC), and CustomWeather (CW). The n-day-ahead forecasts, where n ranges from 1 to 3 for the NWS, from 1 to 9 for TWC, and from 1 to 14 for CW, are analyzed. The dataset includes almost 13 million PoP forecasts, or about 500 000 PoPs per provider per day of lead time. Data were collected over a 2-yr period (1 November 2008?31 October 2010) at 734 observation stations across the contiguous United States. In addition to verifying these PoP forecasts in an absolute sense, relative comparisons are made between the providers. It is found that, in most cases, TWC does not add skill to NWS forecasts. Perhaps most interestingly, it is also found that CW does have the ability to forecast PoPs at a resolution of 0.01.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparing NWS PoP Forecasts to Third-Party Providers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue10
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/2011MWR3525.1
    journal fristpage3304
    journal lastpage3321
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2011:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian