YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Patterns of Land Surface Errors and Biases in the Global Forecast System

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2010:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005::page 1569
    Author:
    Werth, David
    ,
    Garrett, Alfred
    DOI: 10.1175/2010MWR3423.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: ne year?s worth of Global Forecast System (GFS) predictions of surface meteorological variables (wind speed, air temperature, dewpoint temperature, sea level pressure) are validated for land-based stations over the entire planet for forecasts extending from 0 h into the future (an analysis) to 7 days. Approximately 12 000 surface stations worldwide were included in this analysis. Root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) increased as the forecast period increased from 0 to 36 h, but the initial RMSEs were almost as large as the 36-h forecast RMSEs for all variables. Typical RMSEs were 3°C for air temperature, 2?3 mb for sea level pressure, 3.5°C for dewpoint temperature, and 2.5 m s?1 for wind speed.An analysis of the biases at each station shows that the biggest errors are associated with mountain ranges and other areas of steep topography, with land?sea contrasts also playing a role. When the error is decomposed into the bias, variance, and correlation terms, the large initial RMSEs for the 0-h forecasts are seen to be due to a large forecast bias (which persisted into the longer forecasts) with errors in forecast correlation also making a large contribution.A validation of two subdomains showed results similar to the global validation, but the dependence of the biases on the forecast time was clearer. Finally, the RMSE values climb as forecasts go out when validated out to a period of 7 days as the correlation error term grows.
    • Download: (7.350Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Patterns of Land Surface Errors and Biases in the Global Forecast System

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4213244
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWerth, David
    contributor authorGarrett, Alfred
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:38:14Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:38:14Z
    date copyright2011/05/01
    date issued2010
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-71361.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4213244
    description abstractne year?s worth of Global Forecast System (GFS) predictions of surface meteorological variables (wind speed, air temperature, dewpoint temperature, sea level pressure) are validated for land-based stations over the entire planet for forecasts extending from 0 h into the future (an analysis) to 7 days. Approximately 12 000 surface stations worldwide were included in this analysis. Root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) increased as the forecast period increased from 0 to 36 h, but the initial RMSEs were almost as large as the 36-h forecast RMSEs for all variables. Typical RMSEs were 3°C for air temperature, 2?3 mb for sea level pressure, 3.5°C for dewpoint temperature, and 2.5 m s?1 for wind speed.An analysis of the biases at each station shows that the biggest errors are associated with mountain ranges and other areas of steep topography, with land?sea contrasts also playing a role. When the error is decomposed into the bias, variance, and correlation terms, the large initial RMSEs for the 0-h forecasts are seen to be due to a large forecast bias (which persisted into the longer forecasts) with errors in forecast correlation also making a large contribution.A validation of two subdomains showed results similar to the global validation, but the dependence of the biases on the forecast time was clearer. Finally, the RMSE values climb as forecasts go out when validated out to a period of 7 days as the correlation error term grows.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titlePatterns of Land Surface Errors and Biases in the Global Forecast System
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue5
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/2010MWR3423.1
    journal fristpage1569
    journal lastpage1582
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2010:;volume( 139 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian