YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Verifying Forecasts Spatially

    Source: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2010:;volume( 091 ):;issue: 010::page 1365
    Author:
    Gilleland, Eric
    ,
    Ahijevych, David A.
    ,
    Brown, Barbara G.
    ,
    Ebert, Elizabeth E.
    DOI: 10.1175/2010BAMS2819.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: new methods have been proposed for using spatial information to better quantify and diagnose forecast performance when forecasts and observations are both available on the same grid. The majority of the new spatial verification methods can be classified into four broad categories (neighborhood, scale separation, features based, and field deformation), which themselves can be further generalized into two categories of filter and displacement. Because the methods make use of spatial information in widely different ways, users may be uncertain about what types of information each provides, and which methods may be most beneficial for particular applications. As an international project, the Spatial Forecast Verification Methods Inter-Comparison Project (ICP; www.ral.ucar.edu/projects/icp) was formed to address these questions. This project was coordinated by NCAR and facilitated by the WMO/World Weather Research Programme (WWRP) Joint Working Group on Forecast Verification Research. An overview of the methods involved in the project is provided here with some initial guidelines about when each of the verification approaches may be most appropriate. Future spatial verification methods may include hybrid methods that combine aspects of filter and displacement approaches.
    • Download: (1.229Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Verifying Forecasts Spatially

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4211538
    Collections
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGilleland, Eric
    contributor authorAhijevych, David A.
    contributor authorBrown, Barbara G.
    contributor authorEbert, Elizabeth E.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:33:02Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:33:02Z
    date copyright2010/10/01
    date issued2010
    identifier issn0003-0007
    identifier otherams-69826.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4211538
    description abstractnew methods have been proposed for using spatial information to better quantify and diagnose forecast performance when forecasts and observations are both available on the same grid. The majority of the new spatial verification methods can be classified into four broad categories (neighborhood, scale separation, features based, and field deformation), which themselves can be further generalized into two categories of filter and displacement. Because the methods make use of spatial information in widely different ways, users may be uncertain about what types of information each provides, and which methods may be most beneficial for particular applications. As an international project, the Spatial Forecast Verification Methods Inter-Comparison Project (ICP; www.ral.ucar.edu/projects/icp) was formed to address these questions. This project was coordinated by NCAR and facilitated by the WMO/World Weather Research Programme (WWRP) Joint Working Group on Forecast Verification Research. An overview of the methods involved in the project is provided here with some initial guidelines about when each of the verification approaches may be most appropriate. Future spatial verification methods may include hybrid methods that combine aspects of filter and displacement approaches.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleVerifying Forecasts Spatially
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume91
    journal issue10
    journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    identifier doi10.1175/2010BAMS2819.1
    journal fristpage1365
    journal lastpage1373
    treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2010:;volume( 091 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian