YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Deterministic Ensemble Forecasts Using Gene-Expression Programming

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2009:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 005::page 1431
    Author:
    Bakhshaii, Atoossa
    ,
    Stull, Roland
    DOI: 10.1175/2009WAF2222192.1
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A method called gene-expression programming (GEP), which uses symbolic regression to form a nonlinear combination of ensemble NWP forecasts, is introduced. From a population of competing and evolving algorithms (each of which can create a different combination of NWP ensemble members), GEP uses computational natural selection to find the algorithm that maximizes a weather verification fitness function. The resulting best algorithm yields a deterministic ensemble forecast (DEF) that could serve as an alternative to the traditional ensemble average. Motivated by the difficulty in forecasting montane precipitation, the ability of GEP to produce bias-corrected short-range 24-h-accumulated precipitation DEFs is tested at 24 weather stations in mountainous southwestern Canada. As input to GEP are 11 limited-area ensemble members from three different NWP models at four horizontal grid spacings. The data consist of 198 quality controlled observation?forecast date pairs during the two fall?spring rainy seasons of October 2003?March 2005. Comparing the verification scores of GEP DEF versus an equally weighted ensemble-average DEF, the GEP DEFs were found to be better for about half of the mountain weather stations tested, while ensemble-average DEFs were better for the remaining stations. Regarding the multimodel multigrid-size ?ensemble space? spanned by the ensemble members, a sparse sampling of this space with several carefully chosen ensemble members is found to create a DEF that is almost as good as a DEF using the full 11-member ensemble. The best GEP algorithms are nonunique and irreproducible, yet give consistent results that can be used to good advantage at selected weather stations.
    • Download: (2.009Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Deterministic Ensemble Forecasts Using Gene-Expression Programming

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4211409
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBakhshaii, Atoossa
    contributor authorStull, Roland
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:32:38Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:32:38Z
    date copyright2009/10/01
    date issued2009
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-69710.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4211409
    description abstractA method called gene-expression programming (GEP), which uses symbolic regression to form a nonlinear combination of ensemble NWP forecasts, is introduced. From a population of competing and evolving algorithms (each of which can create a different combination of NWP ensemble members), GEP uses computational natural selection to find the algorithm that maximizes a weather verification fitness function. The resulting best algorithm yields a deterministic ensemble forecast (DEF) that could serve as an alternative to the traditional ensemble average. Motivated by the difficulty in forecasting montane precipitation, the ability of GEP to produce bias-corrected short-range 24-h-accumulated precipitation DEFs is tested at 24 weather stations in mountainous southwestern Canada. As input to GEP are 11 limited-area ensemble members from three different NWP models at four horizontal grid spacings. The data consist of 198 quality controlled observation?forecast date pairs during the two fall?spring rainy seasons of October 2003?March 2005. Comparing the verification scores of GEP DEF versus an equally weighted ensemble-average DEF, the GEP DEFs were found to be better for about half of the mountain weather stations tested, while ensemble-average DEFs were better for the remaining stations. Regarding the multimodel multigrid-size ?ensemble space? spanned by the ensemble members, a sparse sampling of this space with several carefully chosen ensemble members is found to create a DEF that is almost as good as a DEF using the full 11-member ensemble. The best GEP algorithms are nonunique and irreproducible, yet give consistent results that can be used to good advantage at selected weather stations.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleDeterministic Ensemble Forecasts Using Gene-Expression Programming
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue5
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/2009WAF2222192.1
    journal fristpage1431
    journal lastpage1451
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;2009:;volume( 024 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian