Partnering—New Benefits from Peering Inside the Black BoxSource: Journal of Management in Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 006Author:Frederick D. Lazar
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1997)13:6(75)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: This paper provides an overview of research into issues of “why” and “how” the Project-Term Strategic Partnering (“partnering”) process works. A distinction is made between a “first wave” of partnering users influenced by “early-adopter” and “pent-up demand” motivations, and a “second wave” motivated by partnering's record of economic success. The question of a potential difference in the rate of successful partnering between the two waves of groups is explored. The possible need for a different approach to managing interorganizational relationships in second wave partnering attempts is discussed. A model for the transformation of adversarial to partnering relationships is identified. Recommendations are made as to the successful use of this model. The difference between trust-based and reciprocity-governed partnering relationships, and their implications for management policies and decision making are discussed. Four types of “barriers” to partnering are identified: (1) external environment; (2) organizational culture; (3) organizational climate; and (4) organizational structure. Remedies to each barrier are briefly described. Future directions of research are also discussed.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Frederick D. Lazar | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:11:22Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:11:22Z | |
| date copyright | November 1997 | |
| date issued | 1997 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290742-597x%281997%2913%3A6%2875%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/42083 | |
| description abstract | This paper provides an overview of research into issues of “why” and “how” the Project-Term Strategic Partnering (“partnering”) process works. A distinction is made between a “first wave” of partnering users influenced by “early-adopter” and “pent-up demand” motivations, and a “second wave” motivated by partnering's record of economic success. The question of a potential difference in the rate of successful partnering between the two waves of groups is explored. The possible need for a different approach to managing interorganizational relationships in second wave partnering attempts is discussed. A model for the transformation of adversarial to partnering relationships is identified. Recommendations are made as to the successful use of this model. The difference between trust-based and reciprocity-governed partnering relationships, and their implications for management policies and decision making are discussed. Four types of “barriers” to partnering are identified: (1) external environment; (2) organizational culture; (3) organizational climate; and (4) organizational structure. Remedies to each barrier are briefly described. Future directions of research are also discussed. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Partnering—New Benefits from Peering Inside the Black Box | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 13 | |
| journal issue | 6 | |
| journal title | Journal of Management in Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1997)13:6(75) | |
| tree | Journal of Management in Engineering:;1997:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 006 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |