YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Application of the Newton–Krylov Method to Geophysical Flows

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;2001:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 009::page 2404
    Author:
    Reisner, Jon
    ,
    Mousseau, Vincent
    ,
    Knoll, Dana
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2404:AOTNKM>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: An implicit nonlinear algorithm, the Newton?Krylov method, for the efficient and accurate simulation of the Navier?Stokes equations, is presented. This method is a combination of a nonlinear outer Newton-based iteration and a linear inner conjugate residual (Krylov) iteration but does not require the explicit formation of the Jacobian matrix. This is referred to here as Jacobian-free Newton?Krylov (JFNK). The mechanics of the method are quite simple and the method has been previously used to solve a variety of complex coupled nonlinear equations. Like most Krylov-based schemes, the key to the efficiency of the method is preconditioning. Details concerning how preconditioning is implemented into this algorithm will be illustrated in a simple one-dimensional shallow-water framework. Another important aspect of this work is examining the accuracy and efficiency of the Newton?Krylov method against an explicit method of averaging (MOA) approach. This will aid in the determination of regimes for which implicit techniques are accurate and/or efficient. Finally, results from the Navier?Stokes fluid solver used in this paper are presented. This solver employs both the JFNK and MOA approaches, and it is reasonably efficient and accurate over a large parameter space. As an illustration of the robustness of this fluid solver two different flow regimes will be shown: two-dimensional hydrostatic mountain-wave flow employing a broad mountain and two-dimensional nonhydrostatic flow employing a steep mountain and high spatial resolution.
    • Download: (188.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Application of the Newton–Krylov Method to Geophysical Flows

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4204840
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorReisner, Jon
    contributor authorMousseau, Vincent
    contributor authorKnoll, Dana
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:13:56Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:13:56Z
    date copyright2001/09/01
    date issued2001
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-63798.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4204840
    description abstractAn implicit nonlinear algorithm, the Newton?Krylov method, for the efficient and accurate simulation of the Navier?Stokes equations, is presented. This method is a combination of a nonlinear outer Newton-based iteration and a linear inner conjugate residual (Krylov) iteration but does not require the explicit formation of the Jacobian matrix. This is referred to here as Jacobian-free Newton?Krylov (JFNK). The mechanics of the method are quite simple and the method has been previously used to solve a variety of complex coupled nonlinear equations. Like most Krylov-based schemes, the key to the efficiency of the method is preconditioning. Details concerning how preconditioning is implemented into this algorithm will be illustrated in a simple one-dimensional shallow-water framework. Another important aspect of this work is examining the accuracy and efficiency of the Newton?Krylov method against an explicit method of averaging (MOA) approach. This will aid in the determination of regimes for which implicit techniques are accurate and/or efficient. Finally, results from the Navier?Stokes fluid solver used in this paper are presented. This solver employs both the JFNK and MOA approaches, and it is reasonably efficient and accurate over a large parameter space. As an illustration of the robustness of this fluid solver two different flow regimes will be shown: two-dimensional hydrostatic mountain-wave flow employing a broad mountain and two-dimensional nonhydrostatic flow employing a steep mountain and high spatial resolution.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleApplication of the Newton–Krylov Method to Geophysical Flows
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume129
    journal issue9
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2404:AOTNKM>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage2404
    journal lastpage2415
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;2001:;volume( 129 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian