YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Prediction of Northeast Brazil Rainfall Anomalies

    Source: Journal of Climate:;1990:;volume( 003 ):;issue: 008::page 893
    Author:
    Hastenrath, Stefan
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1990)003<0893:PONBRA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Expanding on earlier research, empirically based methods are developed for predicting March-September rainfall in northern Northeast Brazil. From a network of 27 raingage stations in Brazil's Nordeste, new rainfall index series are constructed for March-September (MS) and October-January (OJ). Data input to stepwise multiple regression models further include January values of the Tahiti minus Darwin pressure index, an index of sea surface temperature (SST) in the equatorial Pacific (PWT), and indices of the fields of meridional (v) and zonal (u) wind components and of SST in the tropical Atlantic between 30°N and 30°S (AFV, ARJ, and AFT, respectively). Empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis of the v, u, and SST fields was used in constructing the latter three indices. Throughout the study, a sharp distinction is kept between a ?dependent? dataset (1921?42 and 1948?57) used as a training period and an ?independent? portion of the record (1958?87) reserved for prediction experiments. Preseason rainfall (OJ) is by far the most powerful predictor, allowing 52% of the interannual MS variance in an independent dataset to be forecast. From experiments with unrestricted data input, a model with the predictors OJ, AFV, and PWT shows the best performance, capturing 71% of the MS variance in the independent dataset. Experiments on the optimal length of the training period suggest that one of 20?30 years is adequate. Updating offers no advantage over a fixed training period. For the purposes of operational application, the maintenance and timely processing of raingage measurements is of paramount importance. The next important task, demanding considerably greater resources, would be the real-lime monitoring of the surface wind field over the tropical Atlantic.
    • Download: (938.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Prediction of Northeast Brazil Rainfall Anomalies

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4175401
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHastenrath, Stefan
    date accessioned2017-06-09T15:12:22Z
    date available2017-06-09T15:12:22Z
    date copyright1990/08/01
    date issued1990
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-3730.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4175401
    description abstractExpanding on earlier research, empirically based methods are developed for predicting March-September rainfall in northern Northeast Brazil. From a network of 27 raingage stations in Brazil's Nordeste, new rainfall index series are constructed for March-September (MS) and October-January (OJ). Data input to stepwise multiple regression models further include January values of the Tahiti minus Darwin pressure index, an index of sea surface temperature (SST) in the equatorial Pacific (PWT), and indices of the fields of meridional (v) and zonal (u) wind components and of SST in the tropical Atlantic between 30°N and 30°S (AFV, ARJ, and AFT, respectively). Empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis of the v, u, and SST fields was used in constructing the latter three indices. Throughout the study, a sharp distinction is kept between a ?dependent? dataset (1921?42 and 1948?57) used as a training period and an ?independent? portion of the record (1958?87) reserved for prediction experiments. Preseason rainfall (OJ) is by far the most powerful predictor, allowing 52% of the interannual MS variance in an independent dataset to be forecast. From experiments with unrestricted data input, a model with the predictors OJ, AFV, and PWT shows the best performance, capturing 71% of the MS variance in the independent dataset. Experiments on the optimal length of the training period suggest that one of 20?30 years is adequate. Updating offers no advantage over a fixed training period. For the purposes of operational application, the maintenance and timely processing of raingage measurements is of paramount importance. The next important task, demanding considerably greater resources, would be the real-lime monitoring of the surface wind field over the tropical Atlantic.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titlePrediction of Northeast Brazil Rainfall Anomalies
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume3
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0442(1990)003<0893:PONBRA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage893
    journal lastpage904
    treeJournal of Climate:;1990:;volume( 003 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian