YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Observed (HF Radar and ADCP Measurements) and Computed Tides in the North Channel of the Irish Sea

    Source: Journal of Physical Oceanography:;2001:;Volume( 031 ):;issue: 007::page 1764
    Author:
    Davies, Alan M.
    ,
    Hall, Philip
    ,
    Howarth, M. John
    ,
    Knight, Philip J.
    ,
    Player, Rose J.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<1764:COOHRA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A three-dimensional high-resolution (grid of order 1 km) model of the North Channel of the Irish Sea, incorporating a one equation turbulence energy submodel to parameterize vertical mixing, is used to compute the M2, S2, N2, K1, and O1 tides. Elevations and currents are compared with observations, with particular emphasis on a detailed comparison with current profiles recorded by two acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) and HF radar measurements of the surface current. The comparison with the HF radar shows small-scale spatial variations in both modeled and observed currents superimposed upon the larger scale tidal currents. These small-scale changes appear to be associated with variations in bottom topography and can only be resolved by using fine-grid models or detailed measurements. Computed M2 current profiles derived from a multiconstituent calculation are in excellent agreement with profiles measured by the ADCPs. However, in a single constituent M2 calculation, the magnitude of the current is overpredicted. Increasing the bottom friction coefficient to compensate for the absence of other constituents improves the accuracy of the bottom current, although the thickness of the turbulent boundary layer is underpredicted with a resulting overprediction of the surface current that cannot be corrected for by changing the bottom friction coefficient.
    • Download: (689.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Observed (HF Radar and ADCP Measurements) and Computed Tides in the North Channel of the Irish Sea

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4166692
    Collections
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDavies, Alan M.
    contributor authorHall, Philip
    contributor authorHowarth, M. John
    contributor authorKnight, Philip J.
    contributor authorPlayer, Rose J.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:54:38Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:54:38Z
    date copyright2001/07/01
    date issued2001
    identifier issn0022-3670
    identifier otherams-29462.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4166692
    description abstractA three-dimensional high-resolution (grid of order 1 km) model of the North Channel of the Irish Sea, incorporating a one equation turbulence energy submodel to parameterize vertical mixing, is used to compute the M2, S2, N2, K1, and O1 tides. Elevations and currents are compared with observations, with particular emphasis on a detailed comparison with current profiles recorded by two acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) and HF radar measurements of the surface current. The comparison with the HF radar shows small-scale spatial variations in both modeled and observed currents superimposed upon the larger scale tidal currents. These small-scale changes appear to be associated with variations in bottom topography and can only be resolved by using fine-grid models or detailed measurements. Computed M2 current profiles derived from a multiconstituent calculation are in excellent agreement with profiles measured by the ADCPs. However, in a single constituent M2 calculation, the magnitude of the current is overpredicted. Increasing the bottom friction coefficient to compensate for the absence of other constituents improves the accuracy of the bottom current, although the thickness of the turbulent boundary layer is underpredicted with a resulting overprediction of the surface current that cannot be corrected for by changing the bottom friction coefficient.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparison of Observed (HF Radar and ADCP Measurements) and Computed Tides in the North Channel of the Irish Sea
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume31
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<1764:COOHRA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1764
    journal lastpage1785
    treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;2001:;Volume( 031 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian