YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Finite-Element and Finite-Difference Schemes. Part I: One-Dimensional Gravity Wave Motion

    Source: Journal of Physical Oceanography:;1978:;Volume( 008 ):;issue: 004::page 676
    Author:
    Thacker, W. C.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1978)008<0676:COFEAF>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The finite-element scheme requires more computational expense because it is time-implicit and because it requires a smaller time step than the finite-difference scheme. Simulations of normal mode oscillations reveal that for cases where the basin depth and the numerical grid are uniform, the finite-difference scheme is more accurate, but for cases where the depth or the grid varies, the finite-element scheme is more accurate.
    • Download: (298.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Finite-Element and Finite-Difference Schemes. Part I: One-Dimensional Gravity Wave Motion

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4162658
    Collections
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography

    Show full item record

    contributor authorThacker, W. C.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:44:49Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:44:49Z
    date copyright1978/07/01
    date issued1978
    identifier issn0022-3670
    identifier otherams-25831.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4162658
    description abstractThe finite-element scheme requires more computational expense because it is time-implicit and because it requires a smaller time step than the finite-difference scheme. Simulations of normal mode oscillations reveal that for cases where the basin depth and the numerical grid are uniform, the finite-difference scheme is more accurate, but for cases where the depth or the grid varies, the finite-element scheme is more accurate.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparison of Finite-Element and Finite-Difference Schemes. Part I: One-Dimensional Gravity Wave Motion
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume8
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0485(1978)008<0676:COFEAF>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage676
    journal lastpage679
    treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;1978:;Volume( 008 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian