YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Accuracy of United States Tropical Cyclone Landfall Forecasts in the Atlantic Basin (1976–2000)

    Source: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2001:;volume( 082 ):;issue: 012::page 2749
    Author:
    Powell, Mark D.
    ,
    Aberson, Sim D.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2749:AOUSTC>2.3.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: About 13% of all Atlantic basin tropical cyclone forecasts issued from 1976 to 2000 are for landfalls along the United States coastline, and 2% more are for storms forecast to make landfall in the United States but that remain at sea. Landfall position and time forecasts are skillful at all forecast time periods and are more skillful than Atlantic basin track forecasts as a whole, but within 30 h of predicted landfall, timing errors demonstrate an early bias of 1.5?2.5 h. Landfall forecasts are most accurate for storms moving at oblique or normal angles to the coastline and slow?moving storms. During the last quarter century, after adjustment for forecast difficulty, no statistically significant improvement or degradation is noted for landfall position forecasts. Time of landfall forecasts indicate no degradation at any period and significant improvement for the 19?30?h period. The early bias and lack of improvement are consistent with a conservative or "least regret" forecast and warning strategy to account for possible storm accelerations. Landfall timing uncertainty is ~11 h at 24 and 36 h, which suggests that hurricane warnings could be disseminated about 12 h earlier (at 36 h, rather than 24 h, before predicted landfall) without substantial loss of lead time accuracy (although warning areas necessarily would be larger). Reconsideration of National Weather Service Strategic Plan and United States Weather Research Program track forecast goals is recommended in light of these results.
    • Download: (206.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Accuracy of United States Tropical Cyclone Landfall Forecasts in the Atlantic Basin (1976–2000)

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4161903
    Collections
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPowell, Mark D.
    contributor authorAberson, Sim D.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:43:09Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:43:09Z
    date copyright2001/12/01
    date issued2001
    identifier issn0003-0007
    identifier otherams-25151.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4161903
    description abstractAbout 13% of all Atlantic basin tropical cyclone forecasts issued from 1976 to 2000 are for landfalls along the United States coastline, and 2% more are for storms forecast to make landfall in the United States but that remain at sea. Landfall position and time forecasts are skillful at all forecast time periods and are more skillful than Atlantic basin track forecasts as a whole, but within 30 h of predicted landfall, timing errors demonstrate an early bias of 1.5?2.5 h. Landfall forecasts are most accurate for storms moving at oblique or normal angles to the coastline and slow?moving storms. During the last quarter century, after adjustment for forecast difficulty, no statistically significant improvement or degradation is noted for landfall position forecasts. Time of landfall forecasts indicate no degradation at any period and significant improvement for the 19?30?h period. The early bias and lack of improvement are consistent with a conservative or "least regret" forecast and warning strategy to account for possible storm accelerations. Landfall timing uncertainty is ~11 h at 24 and 36 h, which suggests that hurricane warnings could be disseminated about 12 h earlier (at 36 h, rather than 24 h, before predicted landfall) without substantial loss of lead time accuracy (although warning areas necessarily would be larger). Reconsideration of National Weather Service Strategic Plan and United States Weather Research Program track forecast goals is recommended in light of these results.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAccuracy of United States Tropical Cyclone Landfall Forecasts in the Atlantic Basin (1976–2000)
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume82
    journal issue12
    journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2749:AOUSTC>2.3.CO;2
    journal fristpage2749
    journal lastpage2767
    treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;2001:;volume( 082 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian