YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Skill in Prediction of Explosive Cyclogenesis over the Western North Atlantic Ocean, 1987/88: A Forecast Checklist and NMC Dynamical Models

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;1989:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 002::page 157
    Author:
    Sanders, Frederick
    ,
    Auciello, Eugene P.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004<0157:SIPOEC>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Analyses and predictions of explosive cyclogenesis over the western North Atlantic Ocean during the 1987/88 cold season were compared. The analyses were the manual and automated series produced at the National Meteorological Center (NMC). The forecasts were those produced by the nested grid model (NGM) and the ?aviation run? of the global spectral model (AVN) at NMC, and also by a simple checklist employed by the National Weather Service (NWS) Forecast Office, Boston. Skill of the forecast has evidently improved since the preceding year. Probability of detection of an event in a specified 24-h period, with the manual analyses used as verification, approached 72% for the NGM in the range of 0?24 h with a false alarm rate of 17%. In the range of 36?60 h, the values for the AVN forecasts were 42% and 30%. When the automated analyses were used for verification, forecast performance was somewhat better. The accuracy of the checklist forecasts was comparable to that of the AVN forecasts but not as good as that of the NGM predictions, in the small sample available for comparison. Deepening in the NGM forecasts over the range of 12?24 h was 2 mb less than in the manual analyses, with a correlation of 0.55. The accuracy was limited mainly by errors in timing, with the model failing to well represent the initial analyzed deepening but catching up later. The automated analyses displayed a similar failure, with a correlation of 0.49 between analyses. Uncertainty in initial analysis is a major factor limiting present accuracy, especially at short range.
    • Download: (836.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Skill in Prediction of Explosive Cyclogenesis over the Western North Atlantic Ocean, 1987/88: A Forecast Checklist and NMC Dynamical Models

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4161500
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSanders, Frederick
    contributor authorAuciello, Eugene P.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:42:04Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:42:04Z
    date copyright1989/06/01
    date issued1989
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-2479.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4161500
    description abstractAnalyses and predictions of explosive cyclogenesis over the western North Atlantic Ocean during the 1987/88 cold season were compared. The analyses were the manual and automated series produced at the National Meteorological Center (NMC). The forecasts were those produced by the nested grid model (NGM) and the ?aviation run? of the global spectral model (AVN) at NMC, and also by a simple checklist employed by the National Weather Service (NWS) Forecast Office, Boston. Skill of the forecast has evidently improved since the preceding year. Probability of detection of an event in a specified 24-h period, with the manual analyses used as verification, approached 72% for the NGM in the range of 0?24 h with a false alarm rate of 17%. In the range of 36?60 h, the values for the AVN forecasts were 42% and 30%. When the automated analyses were used for verification, forecast performance was somewhat better. The accuracy of the checklist forecasts was comparable to that of the AVN forecasts but not as good as that of the NGM predictions, in the small sample available for comparison. Deepening in the NGM forecasts over the range of 12?24 h was 2 mb less than in the manual analyses, with a correlation of 0.55. The accuracy was limited mainly by errors in timing, with the model failing to well represent the initial analyzed deepening but catching up later. The automated analyses displayed a similar failure, with a correlation of 0.49 between analyses. Uncertainty in initial analysis is a major factor limiting present accuracy, especially at short range.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSkill in Prediction of Explosive Cyclogenesis over the Western North Atlantic Ocean, 1987/88: A Forecast Checklist and NMC Dynamical Models
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume4
    journal issue2
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004<0157:SIPOEC>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage157
    journal lastpage172
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;1989:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian