YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Decomposing the Atmospheric Flow Using Potential Vorticity Framework

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1991:;Volume( 048 ):;issue: 024::page 2614
    Author:
    Holopainen, Eero
    ,
    Kaurola, Jussi
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<2614:DTAFUP>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The invertibility principle of potential vorticity (PV) is used, within a quasigeostrophic framework, to formally partition the observed atmospheric flow in various ways. The first method separates the contributions of the interior PV and temperature at the lower boundary. In the literature, this approach has mainly been applied to some idealized flows. In real situations, however, this partitioning appears questionable because any nonzero temperature anomaly at the boundary automatically implies a nonzero stability part of the interior PV and, hence, these two contributions never occur independent of each other in nature. At large horizontal scales, the two contributions have a large amplitude at every level and almost cancel each other. The second method decomposes the 3D flow into contributions arising from the vorticity and the stability parts of the PV. This formal partitioning appears essentially to decompose the flow into its barotropic and baroclinic part. The third method explores the role of PV of various layers in inducing the flow. This approach shows that the upper-level flow is very little influenced by PV at the lower levels. In the lower troposphere, however, the large-scale, flow is dictated by PV in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, whereas the smaller-scale features are induced by the local PV, the latter including the effect of the boundary temperature. The third method may be useful as means of verification of atmospheric general circulation models.
    • Download: (1.037Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Decomposing the Atmospheric Flow Using Potential Vorticity Framework

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4156886
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHolopainen, Eero
    contributor authorKaurola, Jussi
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:30:39Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:30:39Z
    date copyright1991/12/01
    date issued1991
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-20636.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4156886
    description abstractThe invertibility principle of potential vorticity (PV) is used, within a quasigeostrophic framework, to formally partition the observed atmospheric flow in various ways. The first method separates the contributions of the interior PV and temperature at the lower boundary. In the literature, this approach has mainly been applied to some idealized flows. In real situations, however, this partitioning appears questionable because any nonzero temperature anomaly at the boundary automatically implies a nonzero stability part of the interior PV and, hence, these two contributions never occur independent of each other in nature. At large horizontal scales, the two contributions have a large amplitude at every level and almost cancel each other. The second method decomposes the 3D flow into contributions arising from the vorticity and the stability parts of the PV. This formal partitioning appears essentially to decompose the flow into its barotropic and baroclinic part. The third method explores the role of PV of various layers in inducing the flow. This approach shows that the upper-level flow is very little influenced by PV at the lower levels. In the lower troposphere, however, the large-scale, flow is dictated by PV in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, whereas the smaller-scale features are induced by the local PV, the latter including the effect of the boundary temperature. The third method may be useful as means of verification of atmospheric general circulation models.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleDecomposing the Atmospheric Flow Using Potential Vorticity Framework
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume48
    journal issue24
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<2614:DTAFUP>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage2614
    journal lastpage2625
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1991:;Volume( 048 ):;issue: 024
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian