YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Estimating Cloud Type from Pyranometer Observations

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;1999:;volume( 038 ):;issue: 001::page 132
    Author:
    Duchon, Claude E.
    ,
    O’Malley, Mark S.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0132:ECTFPO>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: In this paper the authors evaluate an inexpensive and automatable method to estimate cloud type at a given location during daylight hours using the time series of irradiance from a pyranometer. The motivation for this investigation is to provide ground-based estimates of cloud type at locations where there are no human observations of sky condition. A pyranometer naturally measures the effect of intervening clouds along the solar beam path to the sensor. Because a daily time series of irradiance is nonstationary, it is appropriately scaled to yield a stationary time series. From the latter, the standard deviation and ratio of observed irradiance to clear-sky irradiance derived from a 21-min moving window are related to one of the following cloud types or conditions:cirrus, cumulus, cirrus and cumulus, stratus, precipitation or fog, no clouds, and other clouds. Comparisons with human observations at the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Calibration and Radiation Testbed site in northern Oklahoma show that the pyranometer method and human observations are in agreement about 45% of the time. Many of the differences can be attributed to two factors: 1) the pyranometer method is weighted toward clouds crossing the sun?s path, while the human observer can view clouds over the entire sky, and 2) the presence of aerosols causes the pyranometer to overestimate the occurrence of cirrus and cirrus plus cumulus. When attenuation of the solar beam by aerosols is negligible or can be accounted for, the pyranometer method should be especially useful for cloud-type assessment where no other sky observations are available.
    • Download: (209.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Estimating Cloud Type from Pyranometer Observations

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4148039
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDuchon, Claude E.
    contributor authorO’Malley, Mark S.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:06:50Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:06:50Z
    date copyright1999/01/01
    date issued1999
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-12674.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148039
    description abstractIn this paper the authors evaluate an inexpensive and automatable method to estimate cloud type at a given location during daylight hours using the time series of irradiance from a pyranometer. The motivation for this investigation is to provide ground-based estimates of cloud type at locations where there are no human observations of sky condition. A pyranometer naturally measures the effect of intervening clouds along the solar beam path to the sensor. Because a daily time series of irradiance is nonstationary, it is appropriately scaled to yield a stationary time series. From the latter, the standard deviation and ratio of observed irradiance to clear-sky irradiance derived from a 21-min moving window are related to one of the following cloud types or conditions:cirrus, cumulus, cirrus and cumulus, stratus, precipitation or fog, no clouds, and other clouds. Comparisons with human observations at the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Calibration and Radiation Testbed site in northern Oklahoma show that the pyranometer method and human observations are in agreement about 45% of the time. Many of the differences can be attributed to two factors: 1) the pyranometer method is weighted toward clouds crossing the sun?s path, while the human observer can view clouds over the entire sky, and 2) the presence of aerosols causes the pyranometer to overestimate the occurrence of cirrus and cirrus plus cumulus. When attenuation of the solar beam by aerosols is negligible or can be accounted for, the pyranometer method should be especially useful for cloud-type assessment where no other sky observations are available.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEstimating Cloud Type from Pyranometer Observations
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume38
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0132:ECTFPO>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage132
    journal lastpage141
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;1999:;volume( 038 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian