Estimating Flood Frequency and Average Annual DamageSource: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 002Author:Leo R. Beard
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:2(84)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: In the National Research Council (NRC) report, “Flood Risk Management and the American River Basin—An Evaluation,” the use of expected probability (accounting for sampling uncertainty) in estimating flood frequencies and average annual flood damages, as practiced by the Corps of Engineers, was concluded to be biased. Alternative procedures recommended in the report are based on studies of samples drawn from a Gaussian population with a fixed damage function. There is no extension of the study to diverse populations (many flood locations) with different flow-damage functions, but conclusions drawn are that the recommended procedures provide frequency and damage estimates that are nearly unbiased. Rationale behind the report study is examined, and it is demonstrated herein that expected-probability procedures used by the Corps are indeed appropriate for flood-frequency estimation and for estimation of average annual flood damages.
|
Show full item record
| contributor author | Leo R. Beard | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:07:19Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:07:19Z | |
| date copyright | March 1997 | |
| date issued | 1997 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9496%281997%29123%3A2%2884%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39472 | |
| description abstract | In the National Research Council (NRC) report, “Flood Risk Management and the American River Basin—An Evaluation,” the use of expected probability (accounting for sampling uncertainty) in estimating flood frequencies and average annual flood damages, as practiced by the Corps of Engineers, was concluded to be biased. Alternative procedures recommended in the report are based on studies of samples drawn from a Gaussian population with a fixed damage function. There is no extension of the study to diverse populations (many flood locations) with different flow-damage functions, but conclusions drawn are that the recommended procedures provide frequency and damage estimates that are nearly unbiased. Rationale behind the report study is examined, and it is demonstrated herein that expected-probability procedures used by the Corps are indeed appropriate for flood-frequency estimation and for estimation of average annual flood damages. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Estimating Flood Frequency and Average Annual Damage | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 123 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:2(84) | |
| tree | Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |