Show simple item record

contributor authorDennis H. Ross
contributor authorScott Ian Thorpe
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:05:28Z
date available2017-05-08T21:05:28Z
date copyrightSeptember 1992
date issued1992
identifier other%28asce%290733-9488%281992%29118%3A3%28106%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38283
description abstractThe use of development impact fees (DIFs) to finance public facilities necessary to accommodate new growth is a concept that has gained acceptance in recent years. California and Florida are considered by many to be the leading areas for the development of theory, practical models, and legislation for determining growth‐related costs and calculating impact fees for new construction. Two methods of calculation of impact fees are discussed: inductive and deductive. A total of 22 potential impact fees for public facilities have been identified, including the conventional water, sewer, and street impact fees. Other potential impact fees include public safety facilities (police and fire), library, public art, and day‐care facilities. The consequences of not using impact fees to offset the cost of providing adequate public facilities for new growth are far‐reaching. Often the full effects of growth are not felt, or recognized, by the community for many years. The community may simply wake up one day to discover that they need to improve a street or intersection to alleviate congestion.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleImpact Fees: Practical Guide for Calculation and Implementation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume118
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1992)118:3(106)
treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;1992:;Volume ( 118 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record