YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Optimization Models for Transportation Project Programming Process

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1995:;Volume ( 121 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Debbie A. Niemeier
    ,
    Zelda B. Zabinsky
    ,
    Zhaohui Zeng
    ,
    G. Scott Rutherford
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:1(14)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Five optimization models are constructed for selecting an optimal subset of projects submitted for a statewide programming process. Our approach develops models that are consistent with user needs and appropriate for the assumptions used in the project prioritization process. Each of the models builds on a basic linear-programming formulation in which a maximization of benefits and minimization of costs is desired. The five models include the following: a priority index that provides a ranking of projects but does not directly facilitate trade-offs between project costs and the ranks (model 1); a model that incorporates a formal approach to making trade-offs between rank and cost (model 2); a model that explicitly includes policy objectives by setting a fixed goal for each objective (model 3); a model that includes a strict budget constraint in addition to requiring that funded projects equal or exceed a fixed goal for each policy objective (model 4); and finally, a model that combines the relative rankings and a budgetary constraint (model 5). Models 2–5 are developed in both a continuous and integer variable format, thus generating nine optimization approaches. Models 4 and 5 also introduce a method for determining the improvement in the overall transportation-system performance, given the current budget and decision-maker objectives.
    • Download: (1.161Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Optimization Models for Transportation Project Programming Process

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/36829
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDebbie A. Niemeier
    contributor authorZelda B. Zabinsky
    contributor authorZhaohui Zeng
    contributor authorG. Scott Rutherford
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:03:09Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:03:09Z
    date copyrightJanuary 1995
    date issued1995
    identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281995%29121%3A1%2814%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36829
    description abstractFive optimization models are constructed for selecting an optimal subset of projects submitted for a statewide programming process. Our approach develops models that are consistent with user needs and appropriate for the assumptions used in the project prioritization process. Each of the models builds on a basic linear-programming formulation in which a maximization of benefits and minimization of costs is desired. The five models include the following: a priority index that provides a ranking of projects but does not directly facilitate trade-offs between project costs and the ranks (model 1); a model that incorporates a formal approach to making trade-offs between rank and cost (model 2); a model that explicitly includes policy objectives by setting a fixed goal for each objective (model 3); a model that includes a strict budget constraint in addition to requiring that funded projects equal or exceed a fixed goal for each policy objective (model 4); and finally, a model that combines the relative rankings and a budgetary constraint (model 5). Models 2–5 are developed in both a continuous and integer variable format, thus generating nine optimization approaches. Models 4 and 5 also introduce a method for determining the improvement in the overall transportation-system performance, given the current budget and decision-maker objectives.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleOptimization Models for Transportation Project Programming Process
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume121
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:1(14)
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1995:;Volume ( 121 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian