YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Asphalt Portland Cement Concrete Composite: Laboratory Evaluation

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    I. L. Al‐Qadi
    ,
    H. Gouru
    ,
    R. E. Weyers
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1994)120:1(94)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The lack of strain characteristics of rigid pavements and bridge deck overlays and the susceptibility of flexible pavements and hot‐mix asphalt overlays to abrasion wear, fuel spillage, and stripping suggests the search for a material that possesses the unique properties of both Portland cement concrete and hot‐mix asphalt such as asphalt‐Portland cement concrete composite (APCCC). APCCC is a hot‐mix asphalt with a high air void content (25–30%) filled with resin‐modified cement grout. The grout consists of Portland cement, fly ash, sand, water, and Prosalvia admixture. The resulting concrete has the properties of both flexible and rigid concrete. A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the performance of APCCC under control conditions. The program included the following tests: stability, indirect tensile strength, compressive strength, resilient modulus, water sensitivity, freezing and thawing, and chloride intrusion resistance. The tests were performed at three levels of moist curing: no moist curing, one‐day moist curing, and three‐day moist curing. APCCC specimens were tested over a period of 28 days. The results were compared to those of hot‐mix asphalt and Portland cement concrete control specimens. The study concluded that APCCC strength and durability properties are better than those of hot‐mix asphalt. The chloride intrusion into APCCC specimens was found to be less than that into normal Portland cement concrete. The study shows that APCCC is an effective alternative material to be used as a bridge deck overlay.
    • Download: (777.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Asphalt Portland Cement Concrete Composite: Laboratory Evaluation

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/36761
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorI. L. Al‐Qadi
    contributor authorH. Gouru
    contributor authorR. E. Weyers
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:03:02Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:03:02Z
    date copyrightJanuary 1994
    date issued1994
    identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281994%29120%3A1%2894%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36761
    description abstractThe lack of strain characteristics of rigid pavements and bridge deck overlays and the susceptibility of flexible pavements and hot‐mix asphalt overlays to abrasion wear, fuel spillage, and stripping suggests the search for a material that possesses the unique properties of both Portland cement concrete and hot‐mix asphalt such as asphalt‐Portland cement concrete composite (APCCC). APCCC is a hot‐mix asphalt with a high air void content (25–30%) filled with resin‐modified cement grout. The grout consists of Portland cement, fly ash, sand, water, and Prosalvia admixture. The resulting concrete has the properties of both flexible and rigid concrete. A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the performance of APCCC under control conditions. The program included the following tests: stability, indirect tensile strength, compressive strength, resilient modulus, water sensitivity, freezing and thawing, and chloride intrusion resistance. The tests were performed at three levels of moist curing: no moist curing, one‐day moist curing, and three‐day moist curing. APCCC specimens were tested over a period of 28 days. The results were compared to those of hot‐mix asphalt and Portland cement concrete control specimens. The study concluded that APCCC strength and durability properties are better than those of hot‐mix asphalt. The chloride intrusion into APCCC specimens was found to be less than that into normal Portland cement concrete. The study shows that APCCC is an effective alternative material to be used as a bridge deck overlay.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAsphalt Portland Cement Concrete Composite: Laboratory Evaluation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume120
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1994)120:1(94)
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian