Show simple item record

contributor authorGary S. Spring
contributor authorJohn Collura
contributor authorPaul W. Shuldiner
contributor authorJames Watson
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:02:43Z
date available2017-05-08T21:02:43Z
date copyrightMay 1991
date issued1991
identifier other%28asce%290733-947x%281991%29117%3A3%28350%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/36571
description abstractThis paper discusses how an expert system can be tested, verified, and validated. A prototype expert system, the Hazardous Location Analyst (HLA), which analyzes high‐accident locations, is used to illustrate the evaluation process and to examine the various aspects of testing, verification, and validation. Identified were several key issues that must be addressed when evaluating an expert system: problem complexity, no “correct answers,” the problem of defining expert‐level performance, and considerations in knowledge‐base refinement. The paper also suggests ways in which to make comparisons between expert‐system and human‐expert inferences so that ease of use, knowledge‐base adequacy, and completeness may be examined. The paper further suggests that although some quantitative performance measures are useful for the evaluation process, a qualitative evaluation is perhaps also appropriate for many aspects of these kinds of systems.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleTesting, Verification, and Validation of Expert Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume117
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1991)117:3(350)
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;1991:;Volume ( 117 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record