| contributor author | Ventura Francesca | |
| contributor author | Facini Osvaldo | |
| contributor author | Piana Stefano | |
| contributor author | Rossi Pisa Paola | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:50:18Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:50:18Z | |
| date copyright | February 2010 | |
| date issued | 2010 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9437%282010%29136%3A2%2881%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/28790 | |
| description abstract | It has long been recognized that reliable, robust, and automated instrumentation for the measurement of soil moisture content can be extremely useful, if not essential, in hydrological, environmental, and agricultural applications. A number of automated techniques for point measurement of soil water content have been developed to operational level over the past few decades. While each of those techniques has been individually calibrated by the gravimetric method, typically under laboratory conditions, there have been few studies that made a direct comparison between the various techniques, particularly under field conditions. This paper compares | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Soil Moisture Measurements: Comparison of Instrumentation Performances | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 136 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2010)136:2(81) | |
| tree | Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 136 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |