Participative Process in Tube Well Irrigation Development

Abstract

Farmer participation in the development of their irrigation systems promises greater farmer satisfaction with the system. It also relieves government of the administrative and cost burden associated with the operation and maintenance of irrigation systems. There are important differences between surface‐ and ground‐water irrigation systems, which are reflected in their operation and maintenance. These in turn impact on the organization and, more specifically, on the form that participation can take. Ground‐water irrigation systems using electrical or diesel pumps are much more cash‐intensive than surface‐water systems, which require mainly labor input from their members. Tube well systems are highly dependent upon a support system of workshops, mechanics, and electricians, and on the supply of diesel fuel or electricity, all of which require payment in cash. Surface‐water irrigation systems are less dependent on support from urban centers, and may be more self‐reliant. These factors affect the nature of farmer participation in tube well systems and the role of the agency promoting participative development.