Form Resistance in Gravel Channels with Mobile BedsSource: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 003Author:George A. Griffiths
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1989)115:3(340)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Form resistance, which includes pressure drag on bed forms and pressure and viscous drag on bed particles in transport, is shown to be a major component of hydraulic roughness in steady, quasi‐uniform, two‐dimensional turbulent flow over mobile gravel beds. Dimensionless form shear stress exceeds dimensionless particle shear stress for values of about three times critical Shields stress in subcritical flow, and five times in supercritical flow. Theoretical analysis provides a physical basis for expressing friction factor as a function of particle friction factor, estimated by the Keulegan equation, and the ratio of form to particle shear stress, termed relative form shear stress. Dimensional reasoning and empirical modeling of flume data demonstrate that relative form shear stress depends on Shields stress and relative roughness in subcritical and upper supercritical flow regimes, and on relative roughness alone in the lower supercritical regime. In particular, for given Shields stress and increasing relative roughness, relative form shear stress increases in subcritical flow because of bed form influences but decreases in supercritical flow owing to transport rate effects. Predictive relations for relative form shear stress allow an explicit solution of the depth‐discharge problem for mobile gravel beds.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | George A. Griffiths | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:40:27Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:40:27Z | |
| date copyright | March 1989 | |
| date issued | 1989 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9429%281989%29115%3A3%28340%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23112 | |
| description abstract | Form resistance, which includes pressure drag on bed forms and pressure and viscous drag on bed particles in transport, is shown to be a major component of hydraulic roughness in steady, quasi‐uniform, two‐dimensional turbulent flow over mobile gravel beds. Dimensionless form shear stress exceeds dimensionless particle shear stress for values of about three times critical Shields stress in subcritical flow, and five times in supercritical flow. Theoretical analysis provides a physical basis for expressing friction factor as a function of particle friction factor, estimated by the Keulegan equation, and the ratio of form to particle shear stress, termed relative form shear stress. Dimensional reasoning and empirical modeling of flume data demonstrate that relative form shear stress depends on Shields stress and relative roughness in subcritical and upper supercritical flow regimes, and on relative roughness alone in the lower supercritical regime. In particular, for given Shields stress and increasing relative roughness, relative form shear stress increases in subcritical flow because of bed form influences but decreases in supercritical flow owing to transport rate effects. Predictive relations for relative form shear stress allow an explicit solution of the depth‐discharge problem for mobile gravel beds. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Form Resistance in Gravel Channels with Mobile Beds | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 115 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1989)115:3(340) | |
| tree | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |