YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Slope‐area Discharge Gaging in Mountain Rivers

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    James C. Bathurst
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:5(376)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Tests of the slope‐area gaging technique at 16 sites in gravel and boulder‐bed rivers with slopes of 0.4–4% in upland Britain show that the field measurements must include detailed surveys of bed cross section and transverse water surface profile and that the major source of error in predicted discharge is the evaluation of the flow resistance coefficient. For the 44 data points errors in predicted discharge compared with measured discharge are
    • Download: (1.209Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Slope‐area Discharge Gaging in Mountain Rivers

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/22640
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJames C. Bathurst
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:39:34Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:39:34Z
    date copyrightMay 1986
    date issued1986
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281986%29112%3A5%28376%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/22640
    description abstractTests of the slope‐area gaging technique at 16 sites in gravel and boulder‐bed rivers with slopes of 0.4–4% in upland Britain show that the field measurements must include detailed surveys of bed cross section and transverse water surface profile and that the major source of error in predicted discharge is the evaluation of the flow resistance coefficient. For the 44 data points errors in predicted discharge compared with measured discharge are
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSlope‐area Discharge Gaging in Mountain Rivers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume112
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:5(376)
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1986:;Volume ( 112 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian