YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    One‐Dimensional Loading‐Rate Effects

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    John V. Farr
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:1(119)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: It has long been recognized that the one‐dimensional or uniaxial strain response of most soils subjected to high‐intensity transient loads (i.e., blast pulses) differs from the response measured under quasi‐static loading rates. Recent research has suggested that for submillisecond rise times, increases up to 10‐fold in the loading constrained modulus occur for some remolded partially saturated granular soils under undrained conditions. Parallel research has shown that, in contrast, loading‐rate effects can be ignored for a similar granular material tested under nearly identical boundary conditions. Stress‐strain curves from 60 uniaxial strain tests are summarized and presented herein depicting the behavior of three soils (two clean sands and a silty clay) to a variety of loading rates. Loadings are typically carried to 10,000 psi (69 MPa) with times to peak ranging from a few tenths of a millisecond to several minutes. These laboratory test results show that a dramatic increase in the loading constrained modulus does not occur for the rise times examined. Rather, a gradual stiffening occurs as the time to peak pressure decreases. The maximum ratio of the dynamic‐to‐static loading constrained modulus is observed to be about a factor of two for the soils tested. Based upon these test results, a strain‐rate and strain‐level dependent modulus stiffening model is developed. This model is implemented into a one‐dimensional plane wave propagation computer code to predict the results of field tests that are performed using two of the three soils tested in this study. A comparison between the laboratory‐based model predicted behavior and response obtained from the field tests is favorable.
    • Download: (1.215Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      One‐Dimensional Loading‐Rate Effects

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/20534
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJohn V. Farr
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:35:30Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:35:30Z
    date copyrightJanuary 1990
    date issued1990
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281990%29116%3A1%28119%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20534
    description abstractIt has long been recognized that the one‐dimensional or uniaxial strain response of most soils subjected to high‐intensity transient loads (i.e., blast pulses) differs from the response measured under quasi‐static loading rates. Recent research has suggested that for submillisecond rise times, increases up to 10‐fold in the loading constrained modulus occur for some remolded partially saturated granular soils under undrained conditions. Parallel research has shown that, in contrast, loading‐rate effects can be ignored for a similar granular material tested under nearly identical boundary conditions. Stress‐strain curves from 60 uniaxial strain tests are summarized and presented herein depicting the behavior of three soils (two clean sands and a silty clay) to a variety of loading rates. Loadings are typically carried to 10,000 psi (69 MPa) with times to peak ranging from a few tenths of a millisecond to several minutes. These laboratory test results show that a dramatic increase in the loading constrained modulus does not occur for the rise times examined. Rather, a gradual stiffening occurs as the time to peak pressure decreases. The maximum ratio of the dynamic‐to‐static loading constrained modulus is observed to be about a factor of two for the soils tested. Based upon these test results, a strain‐rate and strain‐level dependent modulus stiffening model is developed. This model is implemented into a one‐dimensional plane wave propagation computer code to predict the results of field tests that are performed using two of the three soils tested in this study. A comparison between the laboratory‐based model predicted behavior and response obtained from the field tests is favorable.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleOne‐Dimensional Loading‐Rate Effects
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume116
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:1(119)
    treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian