YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Investigation of Spiral and Sweeping Holes

    Source: Journal of Turbomachinery:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 009::page 91007
    Author:
    Thurman, Douglas
    ,
    Poinsatte, Philip
    ,
    Ameri, Ali
    ,
    Culley, Dennis
    ,
    Raghu, Surya
    ,
    Shyam, Vikram
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4032839
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Surface infrared thermography, hotwire anemometry, and thermocouple surveys were performed on two new film cooling hole geometries: spiral/rifled holes and fluidic sweeping holes. The spiral holes attempt to induce largescale vorticity to the film cooling jet as it exits the hole to prevent the formation of the kidneyshaped vortices commonly associated with film cooling jets. The fluidic sweeping hole uses a passive inhole geometry to induce jet sweeping at frequencies that scale with blowing ratios. The spiral hole performance is compared to that of round holes with and without compound angles. The fluidic hole is of the diffusion class of holes and is therefore compared to a 777 hole and square holes. A patentpending spiral hole design showed the highest potential of the nondiffusiontype hole configurations. Velocity contours and flow temperature were acquired at discreet cross sections of the downstream flow field. The passive fluidic sweeping hole shows the most uniform cooling distribution but suffers from low spanaveraged effectiveness levels due to enhanced mixing. The data were taken at a Reynolds number of 11,000 based on hole diameter and freestream velocity. Infrared thermography was taken for blowing ratios of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 at a density ratio of 1.05. The flow inside the fluidic sweeping hole was studied using 3D unsteady Reynoldsaverage Navier–Stokes (RANS).
    • Download: (10.45Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Investigation of Spiral and Sweeping Holes

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/162801
    Collections
    • Journal of Turbomachinery

    Show full item record

    contributor authorThurman, Douglas
    contributor authorPoinsatte, Philip
    contributor authorAmeri, Ali
    contributor authorCulley, Dennis
    contributor authorRaghu, Surya
    contributor authorShyam, Vikram
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:34:17Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:34:17Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0889-504X
    identifier otherturbo_138_09_091007.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162801
    description abstractSurface infrared thermography, hotwire anemometry, and thermocouple surveys were performed on two new film cooling hole geometries: spiral/rifled holes and fluidic sweeping holes. The spiral holes attempt to induce largescale vorticity to the film cooling jet as it exits the hole to prevent the formation of the kidneyshaped vortices commonly associated with film cooling jets. The fluidic sweeping hole uses a passive inhole geometry to induce jet sweeping at frequencies that scale with blowing ratios. The spiral hole performance is compared to that of round holes with and without compound angles. The fluidic hole is of the diffusion class of holes and is therefore compared to a 777 hole and square holes. A patentpending spiral hole design showed the highest potential of the nondiffusiontype hole configurations. Velocity contours and flow temperature were acquired at discreet cross sections of the downstream flow field. The passive fluidic sweeping hole shows the most uniform cooling distribution but suffers from low spanaveraged effectiveness levels due to enhanced mixing. The data were taken at a Reynolds number of 11,000 based on hole diameter and freestream velocity. Infrared thermography was taken for blowing ratios of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 at a density ratio of 1.05. The flow inside the fluidic sweeping hole was studied using 3D unsteady Reynoldsaverage Navier–Stokes (RANS).
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleInvestigation of Spiral and Sweeping Holes
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Turbomachinery
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4032839
    journal fristpage91007
    journal lastpage91007
    identifier eissn1528-8900
    treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian