YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Revisiting the Discrete Element Method for Predictions of Flows Over Rough Surfaces

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 003::page 31205
    Author:
    Aupoix, B.
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4031558
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The discrete element method allows predicting the flow over rough surfaces in a way consistent with the physics, contrary to the classical equivalent sand grain approach, and without requiring the meshing of all the surface details. Up to now, its use was restricted to boundary layer solvers. This paper is an updated version of the work presented by the author 20 years ago (Aupoix, B., 1994, “Modelling of Boundary Layers Over Rough Surfaces,â€‌ Advances in Turbulence V: Proceedings of the Fifth European Turbulence Conference, R. Benzi, ed., Kluwer, Siena, Italy, pp. 16–20): the doubleaveraging technique, which is now a standard approach in porous media, was proposed to derive the flow equations without boundary layer assumptions. This allows extending the use of the discrete element method to Reynolds–Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solvers. Differences with the standard discrete element method, i.e., different location of the blockage coefficients as well as terms omitted in the standard approach, mainly dispersive stresses and modifications of the turbulence model, are evidenced. The modeling of the different terms brought by the doubleaveraging procedure is discussed, in light of the knowledge gained both in the discrete element method and in the modeling of flows in porous media, pointing out some differences between the two situations. “Highresolutionâ€‌ RANS simulations are recommended to further improve the modeling.
    • Download: (344.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Revisiting the Discrete Element Method for Predictions of Flows Over Rough Surfaces

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/161330
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAupoix, B.
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:29:23Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:29:23Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_138_03_031205.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161330
    description abstractThe discrete element method allows predicting the flow over rough surfaces in a way consistent with the physics, contrary to the classical equivalent sand grain approach, and without requiring the meshing of all the surface details. Up to now, its use was restricted to boundary layer solvers. This paper is an updated version of the work presented by the author 20 years ago (Aupoix, B., 1994, “Modelling of Boundary Layers Over Rough Surfaces,â€‌ Advances in Turbulence V: Proceedings of the Fifth European Turbulence Conference, R. Benzi, ed., Kluwer, Siena, Italy, pp. 16–20): the doubleaveraging technique, which is now a standard approach in porous media, was proposed to derive the flow equations without boundary layer assumptions. This allows extending the use of the discrete element method to Reynolds–Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solvers. Differences with the standard discrete element method, i.e., different location of the blockage coefficients as well as terms omitted in the standard approach, mainly dispersive stresses and modifications of the turbulence model, are evidenced. The modeling of the different terms brought by the doubleaveraging procedure is discussed, in light of the knowledge gained both in the discrete element method and in the modeling of flows in porous media, pointing out some differences between the two situations. “Highresolutionâ€‌ RANS simulations are recommended to further improve the modeling.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleRevisiting the Discrete Element Method for Predictions of Flows Over Rough Surfaces
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4031558
    journal fristpage31205
    journal lastpage31205
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian