YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Two Measurement Techniques to Quantify Fuel–Air Mixing of a Gas Turbine Premixer at Atmospheric Conditions

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 005::page 51501
    Author:
    Estefanos, Wessam
    ,
    Hamza, Mahmoud
    ,
    Bhayaraju, Umesh
    ,
    Jeng, San
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4031528
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In the present study, two measurement techniques are adopted to evaluate the fuel–air mixing under atmospheric conditions using an industrial fuel–air premixer. These techniques are CO2 mixing and planar laser induced fluorescence (PLIF) in water. In these techniques, CO2 and fluorescent dye are injected as fuel simulants. CO2 measurements are used to validate PLIF in water. In the CO2 technique, CO2 concentrations are converted to fuel mass fractions, whereas in the PLIF technique, a modified post processing method is used to convert the LIF signal into fuel mass fraction. The experiments are conducted at the same Reynolds number and momentum flux ratio for two injection strategies. To study the effect of the flow aerodynamics on the mixing results, highspeed particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements are conducted in water at the same Reynolds number. A comparison of fuel concentrations measured with the CO2 and PLIF techniques shows good quantitative agreement at all momentum flux ratios. However, deviations between the two techniques are observed at locations of high fuel concentration gradients. The unsteady mixing is evaluated using the PLIF technique with high temporal resolution. Analysis of PIV and PLIF data shows that unsteady mixing is lower at regions of high fluctuations in velocity. Moreover, it is found that there is high unsteady mixing at locations of high concentration gradient.
    • Download: (2.133Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Two Measurement Techniques to Quantify Fuel–Air Mixing of a Gas Turbine Premixer at Atmospheric Conditions

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/161061
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorEstefanos, Wessam
    contributor authorHamza, Mahmoud
    contributor authorBhayaraju, Umesh
    contributor authorJeng, San
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:28:22Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:28:22Z
    date issued2016
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier othergtp_138_05_051501.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161061
    description abstractIn the present study, two measurement techniques are adopted to evaluate the fuel–air mixing under atmospheric conditions using an industrial fuel–air premixer. These techniques are CO2 mixing and planar laser induced fluorescence (PLIF) in water. In these techniques, CO2 and fluorescent dye are injected as fuel simulants. CO2 measurements are used to validate PLIF in water. In the CO2 technique, CO2 concentrations are converted to fuel mass fractions, whereas in the PLIF technique, a modified post processing method is used to convert the LIF signal into fuel mass fraction. The experiments are conducted at the same Reynolds number and momentum flux ratio for two injection strategies. To study the effect of the flow aerodynamics on the mixing results, highspeed particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements are conducted in water at the same Reynolds number. A comparison of fuel concentrations measured with the CO2 and PLIF techniques shows good quantitative agreement at all momentum flux ratios. However, deviations between the two techniques are observed at locations of high fuel concentration gradients. The unsteady mixing is evaluated using the PLIF technique with high temporal resolution. Analysis of PIV and PLIF data shows that unsteady mixing is lower at regions of high fluctuations in velocity. Moreover, it is found that there is high unsteady mixing at locations of high concentration gradient.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleEvaluation of Two Measurement Techniques to Quantify Fuel–Air Mixing of a Gas Turbine Premixer at Atmospheric Conditions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4031528
    journal fristpage51501
    journal lastpage51501
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian