Constitutive Models in Simulating Low Cycle Fatigue and Ratcheting Responses of ElbowSource: Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 003::page 31002DOI: 10.1115/1.4029069Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: As stated in the sister article that the objective of this study was to explore the lowcycle fatigue and ratcheting failure responses of elbow components through experimental and analytical studies. Lowcycle fatigue and ratcheting damage accumulation in piping components may occur under load reversals induced by earthquakes or thermomechanical operations. Ratcheting damage accumulation can cause failure of components through cracking or plastic buckling. Hence, design by analysis of piping components against ratcheting failure will require simulation of this response with reasonable accuracy. In developing a constitutive model that can simulate ratcheting responses of piping components, a systematic set of elbow experiments involving deformation and strain ratcheting were conducted and reported in the sister article. This article will critically evaluate seven different constitutive models against their elbow response simulation capabilities. The widely used bilinear, multilinear, and Chaboche models in ansys are first evaluated. This is followed by evaluation of the modified Chaboche, Ohno–Wang, modified Ohno–Wang, and Abdel Karim–Ohno models. Results from this simulation study are presented to demonstrate that all the seven models can simulate the elbow force response reasonably. The bilinear and multilinear models can simulate the initial elbow diameter change or strain accumulation, but always simulate shakedown during the subsequent cycles when for some of the cases the experimental trends are ratcheting. Advanced constitutive models like Chaboche, modified Chaboche, Ohno–Wang, modified Ohno–Wang, and Abdel Karim–Ohno can simulate many of the elbow ratcheting responses well, but for some of the strain responses, these models simulate negative ratcheting, which is opposite to the experimental trend. Finally, implications of negative ratcheting simulation are discussed and suggestions are made for improving constitutive models ratcheting response simulation.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Hassan, T. | |
| contributor author | Rahman, M. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:23:02Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:23:02Z | |
| date issued | 2015 | |
| identifier issn | 0094-9930 | |
| identifier other | pvt_137_03_031002.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/159462 | |
| description abstract | As stated in the sister article that the objective of this study was to explore the lowcycle fatigue and ratcheting failure responses of elbow components through experimental and analytical studies. Lowcycle fatigue and ratcheting damage accumulation in piping components may occur under load reversals induced by earthquakes or thermomechanical operations. Ratcheting damage accumulation can cause failure of components through cracking or plastic buckling. Hence, design by analysis of piping components against ratcheting failure will require simulation of this response with reasonable accuracy. In developing a constitutive model that can simulate ratcheting responses of piping components, a systematic set of elbow experiments involving deformation and strain ratcheting were conducted and reported in the sister article. This article will critically evaluate seven different constitutive models against their elbow response simulation capabilities. The widely used bilinear, multilinear, and Chaboche models in ansys are first evaluated. This is followed by evaluation of the modified Chaboche, Ohno–Wang, modified Ohno–Wang, and Abdel Karim–Ohno models. Results from this simulation study are presented to demonstrate that all the seven models can simulate the elbow force response reasonably. The bilinear and multilinear models can simulate the initial elbow diameter change or strain accumulation, but always simulate shakedown during the subsequent cycles when for some of the cases the experimental trends are ratcheting. Advanced constitutive models like Chaboche, modified Chaboche, Ohno–Wang, modified Ohno–Wang, and Abdel Karim–Ohno can simulate many of the elbow ratcheting responses well, but for some of the strain responses, these models simulate negative ratcheting, which is opposite to the experimental trend. Finally, implications of negative ratcheting simulation are discussed and suggestions are made for improving constitutive models ratcheting response simulation. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Constitutive Models in Simulating Low Cycle Fatigue and Ratcheting Responses of Elbow | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 137 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4029069 | |
| journal fristpage | 31002 | |
| journal lastpage | 31002 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8978 | |
| tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |