YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Pressure Gradient Effects on Smooth and Rough Surface Turbulent Boundary Layers—Part II: Adverse Pressure Gradient

    Source: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 001::page 11204
    Author:
    Shin, Ju Hyun
    ,
    Jin Song, Seung
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4027475
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: An experimental investigation has been conducted to identify the effects of pressure gradient and surface roughness on turbulent boundary layers. In Part II, smoothand roughsurface turbulent boundary layers with and without adverse pressure gradient (APG) are presented at a fixed Reynolds number (based on the length of flat plate) of 900,000. Flatplate boundary layer measurements have been conducted using a singlesensor, hotwire probe. For smooth surfaces, compared to the zero pressure gradient (ZPG) boundary layer, the APG boundary layer has a higher mean velocity defect throughout the boundary layer and lower friction coefficient. APG decreases the streamwise normal Reynolds stress for y less than 0.4 times the boundary layer thickness and increases it slightly in the outer region. For rough surfaces, APG reduces the roughness effects of increasing the mean velocity defect and normal Reynolds stress for y less than 23 and 28 times the average roughness height, respectively. Consistently, for the same roughness, APG decreases the integrated streamwise turbulent kinetic energy. APG also decreases the roughness effect on the friction coefficient, roughness Reynolds number, and roughness shift. Compared to the ZPG boundary layers, the roughness effects on integral boundary layer parameters—boundary layer thickness and momentum thickness—are weaker under APG. Thus, contrary to the favorable pressure gradient (FPG) in part I, APG reduces the roughness effects on turbulent boundary layers.
    • Download: (893.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Pressure Gradient Effects on Smooth and Rough Surface Turbulent Boundary Layers—Part II: Adverse Pressure Gradient

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/158175
    Collections
    • Journal of Fluids Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorShin, Ju Hyun
    contributor authorJin Song, Seung
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:18:41Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:18:41Z
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0098-2202
    identifier otherfe_137_01_011204.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/158175
    description abstractAn experimental investigation has been conducted to identify the effects of pressure gradient and surface roughness on turbulent boundary layers. In Part II, smoothand roughsurface turbulent boundary layers with and without adverse pressure gradient (APG) are presented at a fixed Reynolds number (based on the length of flat plate) of 900,000. Flatplate boundary layer measurements have been conducted using a singlesensor, hotwire probe. For smooth surfaces, compared to the zero pressure gradient (ZPG) boundary layer, the APG boundary layer has a higher mean velocity defect throughout the boundary layer and lower friction coefficient. APG decreases the streamwise normal Reynolds stress for y less than 0.4 times the boundary layer thickness and increases it slightly in the outer region. For rough surfaces, APG reduces the roughness effects of increasing the mean velocity defect and normal Reynolds stress for y less than 23 and 28 times the average roughness height, respectively. Consistently, for the same roughness, APG decreases the integrated streamwise turbulent kinetic energy. APG also decreases the roughness effect on the friction coefficient, roughness Reynolds number, and roughness shift. Compared to the ZPG boundary layers, the roughness effects on integral boundary layer parameters—boundary layer thickness and momentum thickness—are weaker under APG. Thus, contrary to the favorable pressure gradient (FPG) in part I, APG reduces the roughness effects on turbulent boundary layers.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titlePressure Gradient Effects on Smooth and Rough Surface Turbulent Boundary Layers—Part II: Adverse Pressure Gradient
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume137
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4027475
    journal fristpage11204
    journal lastpage11204
    identifier eissn1528-901X
    treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian